ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2017
A curve-free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for two-agent Phase I trials.
Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Balancing the effective sample size in prior across different doses in the curve-free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for dose-finding trials.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2026Article
- Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2024Article
- Designing Dose-Finding Phase I Clinical Trials: Top 10 Questions That Should Be Discussed With Your Statistician.JCO precision oncology · 2021Article
- A curve free Bayesian decision-theoretic design for phase Ia/Ib trials considering both safety and efficacy outcomes.Statistics in biosciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although Bayesian statistical methods are gaining attention in the medical community, as they provide a natural framework for incorporating prior information, the complexity of these methods limited their adoptions in clinical trials. This article proposes a Bayesian design for two-agent Phase I trials that is relatively easy for clinicians to understand and implement, yet performs comparably to more complex designs, so that it is more likely to be adopted in actual trials. In order to reduce model complexity and computational burden, we choose a working model with conjugate priors so that the posterior distributions have analytical expressions. Furthermore, we provide a simple strategy to facilitate the specification of priors based on the toxicity information accrued from single-agent Phase I trials. The proposed method should be useful in terms of the ease of implementation and the savings in sample size without sacrificing performance. Moreover, the conservativeness of the dose-finding algorithm renders it a relatively safe method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.