Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26882318›Full record

Trial reportClinical neuropharmacology

The Efficacy Profile of Rotigotine During the Waking Hours in Patients With Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis.

Peter A LeWitt, Werner Poewe, Lawrence W Elmer, Mahnaz Asgharnejad, Babak Boroojerdi, Frank Grieger, Lars Bauer

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical neuropharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00244387 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-centre, Multi-national, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, 3- Arm Parallel Group, Placebo- and Pramipexole- Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Rotigotine Patch in Subjects With Advanced Stage, Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease Who Are Not Well Controlled on Levodopa

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB PharmaRan2004 to 2005Enrolled506ConditionsParkinson Disease, IdiopathicArmsSPM 962
NCT00522379 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 5-arm, Parallel-group Trial to Assess Rotigotine Transdermal System Dose Response in Subjects With Advanced-stage Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB PharmaRan2007 to 2011Enrolled514ConditionsParkinson's DiseaseArmsRotigotine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 11 countries.

Peter A LeWitt*Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital; and †Department of Neurology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; ‡Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; §Gardner-McMaster Parkinson Center, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH; ∥UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC; and ¶UCB Pharma, Monheim am Rhein, Germany.
Werner Poewe
Lawrence W Elmer
Mahnaz Asgharnejad
Babak Boroojerdi
Frank Grieger
Lars Bauer
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKGlaxoSmithKline (India) · INKyowa Hakko Kirin (Singapore) · SGUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUCB Pharma (United Kingdom) · GBWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTransdermal delivery of rotigotine maintains stable plasma concentrations for 24 hours. Three phase 3 studies of rotigotine as add-on to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease showed a significant reduction in "off" time from baseline to end of maintenance (EoM). However, detailed analyses over the range of a day have not yet been performed. The objective was to examine the time course of the efficacy profile of rotigotine throughout the day.

methodsPost hoc analysis of diary data from 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of rotigotine in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease inadequately controlled with levodopa, with average "off" time of ≥2.5 h/d (CLEOPATRA-PD [NCT00244387], 16-week maintenance; PREFER, 24-week maintenance; SP921 [NCT00522379], 12-week maintenance). Patients marked 30-minute intervals as "off," "on without troublesome dyskinesia," "on with troublesome dyskinesia," or "sleep." Diaries completed on the 3 days before EoM were analyzed. A 2-sample t test was performed for comparison of rotigotine + levodopa versus placebo + levodopa for mean percentage of time per status during four 6-hour periods: 12:00AM (midnight) to 6:00AM, 6:00AM to 12:00PM (noon), noon to 6:00PM, and 6:00PM to midnight.

resultsData were available for 967 patients (placebo + levodopa, 260; rotigotine + levodopa, 707). During the 24-hour period at EoM, an advantage in mean percentage time spent "off" and "on without troublesome dyskinesia" was observed with rotigotine + levodopa versus placebo + levodopa during the three 6-hour periods from 6:00AM to midnight (P < 0.05; exploratory analysis).

conclusionsThese exploratory analyses of patients with motor fluctuations suggest that the efficacy of rotigotine transdermal patch, as captured by diary data, in reducing "off" time and increasing "on time without troublesome dyskinesia" may cover the full waking day.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDopamine AgonistsDouble-Blind MethodDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSeverity of Illness IndexTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenesWakefulnessDopamine AgonistsLevodoparotigotineTetrahydronaphthalenesThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID26882318
PMCPMC4791317
OpenAlexW2275386823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.