Observational studyJournal of hospital medicine2016
Testing the functional assessment of mentation: A mobile application based assessment of mental status.
Observational study in Journal of hospital medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Partnering is Paramount: Engaging Care Partners to Improve Delirium Identification.WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAltered mental status is a significant predictor of mortality in hospitalized patients and a prerequisite component to the diagnosis of delirium. However, the detection of altered mental status is often incomplete, inaccurate, and resource intensive.
objectiveTo identify the clinical utility and feasibility of the Functional Assessment of Mentation (FAM(TM) ), a mobile application for evaluating attention and recall.
designProspective observational pilot study.
settingTertiary care medical center.
participantsNine hundred thirty-one adult subjects (612 nonhospitalized and 319 hospitalized). MEASUREMENTS: Score distribution and time to FAM(TM) completion were compared between nonhospitalized and hospitalized subjects (as well as between hospitalized subjects discharged home and those not discharged home). Additionally, in the hospitalized subgroup, FAM(TM) was compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) as our criterion standard for altered mental status assessment.
resultsMedian time to completion of FAM(TM) was 55 seconds (interquartile range [IQR], 45-67 seconds). Our data identified a graded reduction in score comparing nonhospitalized subjects to hospitalized subjects discharged home and not discharged home (median 5 [IQR 4-7] vs 5 [IQR 3-6] vs 3 [IQR 1-5]; P < 0.001). In the hospitalized subset, FAM(TM) scores were more highly correlated to SPMSQ (Spearman ρ = 0.27, P < 0.001) compared to GCS (Spearman ρ = 0.05, P = 0.40).
conclusionsFAM(TM) is a rapid and clinically feasible tool that can identify minor alterations in mental status often missed by GCS. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:463-466. 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.