Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26881432›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Microbial Community Profile and Water Quality in a Protected Area of the Caatinga Biome.

Fabyano Alvares Cardoso Lopes, Elisa Caldeira Pires Catão, Renata Henrique Santana, Anderson de Souza Cabral, Rodolfo Paranhos, Thiago Pessanha Rangel, Carlos Eduardo de Rezende, Robert A Edwards, Cristiane C Thompson, Fabiano L Thompson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ecogenomics and Taxonomy of Cyanobacteria Phylum.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabyano Alvares Cardoso LopesCellular Biology Department, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Elisa Caldeira Pires CatãoCellular Biology Department, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Renata Henrique SantanaGenomic Sciences and Biotechnology, Universidade Católica de Brasília (UCB), Brasília DF, Brazil.
Anderson de Souza CabralInstitute of Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodolfo ParanhosInstitute of Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thiago Pessanha RangelLaboratory of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo de RezendeLaboratory of Environmental Sciences, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil.
Robert A EdwardsComputational Science Research Center, San Diego State University (SDSU), San Diego, California, United States of America.
Cristiane C ThompsonInstitute of Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabiano L ThompsonInstitute of Biology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ricardo Henrique KrugerCellular Biology Department, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRState University of Norte Fluminense · BRSan Diego State University · USUniversidade Católica de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caatinga is a semi-arid biome in northeast Brazil. The Paraguaçú River is located in the Caatinga biome, and part of its course is protected by the National Park of Chapada Diamantina (PNCD). In this study we evaluated the effect of PNCD protection on the water quality and microbial community diversity of this river by analyzing water samples obtained from points located inside and outside the PNCD in both wet and dry seasons. Results of water quality analysis showed higher levels of silicate, ammonia, particulate organic carbon, and nitrite in samples from the unprotected area compared with those from protected areas. Pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA genes revealed that Burkholderiales was abundant in samples from all three sites during both seasons and was represented primarily by the genus Polynucleobacter and members of the Comamonadaceae family (e.g., genus Limnohabitans). During the dry season, the unprotected area showed a higher abundance of Flavobacterium sp. and Arthrobacter sp., which are frequently associated with the presence and/or degradation of arsenic and pesticide compounds. In addition, genes that appear to be related to agricultural impacts on the environment, as well as those involved in arsenic and cadmium resistance, copper homeostasis, and propanediol utilization, were detected in the unprotected areas by metagenomic sequencing. Although PNCD protection improves water quality, agricultural activities around the park may affect water quality within the park and may account for the presence of bacteria capable of pesticide degradation and assimilation, evidencing possible anthropogenic impacts on the Caatinga.

Indexed as

Water QualityAgricultureAmmoniaArthrobacterBrazilBurkholderiaceaeCarbonComamonadaceaeEcosystemFlavobacteriumHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomeMicrobial ConsortiaNitritesParticulate MatterPhylogenyAmmoniaCarbonNitritesParticulate MatterRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSilicates

Identifiers

PMID26881432
PMCPMC4755664
OpenAlexW2275164090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.