ReviewPLoS medicine2016
When Children Become Adults: Should Biobanks Re-Contact?
Review in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Delta-S-Cys-Albumin as a Marker of Pediatric Biospecimen Integrity.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2024Article
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data.Journal of medical ethics · 2023Article
- Assent, parental consent and reconsent for health research in Africa: thematic analysis of national guidelines and lessons from the SickleInAfrica registry.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Sharing and Safeguarding Pediatric Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- "Here comes Bio-me": An analysis of a biobank campaign targeted at children.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2021Article
- Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Recontacting participants for expanded uses of existing samples and data: a case study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.PLoS biology · 2017Review
- Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.BMC medical ethics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.