Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26881123›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Large and Small Dendritic Spines Serve Different Interacting Functions in Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Homeostasis.

Joshua J W Paulin, Peter Haslehurst, Alexander D Fellows, Wenfei Liu, Joshua D Jackson, Zelah Joel, Damian M Cummings, Frances A Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua J W PaulinDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Peter HaslehurstDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Alexander D FellowsDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Wenfei LiuDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Joshua D JacksonDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Zelah JoelDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Damian M CummingsDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Frances A EdwardsDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/J011851/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laying down of memory requires strong stimulation resulting in specific changes in synaptic strength and corresponding changes in size of dendritic spines. Strong stimuli can also be pathological, causing a homeostatic response, depressing and shrinking the synapse to prevent damage from too much Ca(2+) influx. But do all types of dendritic spines serve both of these apparently opposite functions? Using confocal microscopy in organotypic slices from mice expressing green fluorescent protein in hippocampal neurones, the size of individual spines along sections of dendrite has been tracked in response to application of tetraethylammonium. This strong stimulus would be expected to cause both a protective homeostatic response and long-term potentiation. We report separation of these functions, with spines of different sizes reacting differently to the same strong stimulus. The immediate shrinkage of large spines suggests a homeostatic protective response during the period of potential danger. In CA1, long-lasting growth of small spines subsequently occurs consolidating long-term potentiation but only after the large spines return to their original size. In contrast, small spines do not change in dentate gyrus where potentiation does not occur. The separation in time of these changes allows clear functional differentiation of spines of different sizes.

Indexed as

HomeostasisLong-Term PotentiationAnimalsCells, CulturedDendritic SpinesExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsFemaleHippocampusMaleMicePyramidal CellsTetraethylammoniumTetraethylammonium

Identifiers

PMID26881123
PMCPMC4736202
OpenAlexW2197350519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.