Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26881119›Full record

ArticleNeural plasticity2016

Distribution of N-Acetylgalactosamine-Positive Perineuronal Nets in the Macaque Brain: Anatomy and Implications.

Adrienne L Mueller, Adam Davis, Samantha Sovich, Steven S Carlson, Farrel R Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural plasticity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reorganization of the Primate Dorsal Horn in Response to a Deafferentation Lesion Affecting Hand Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changes in membrane properties of rat deep cerebellar nuclear projection neurons during acquisition of eyeblink conditioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrienne L MuellerDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Adam DavisDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Samantha SovichDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Steven S CarlsonDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Farrel R RobinsonDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
VISUAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32EY007031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Wyeth Daniel Bair, Anitha Pasupathy · 1985 to 2026
$6.1M
Role of cerebellar parallel fibers in saccade accuracyR01EY018585 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ROBINSON, FARREL R · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS 2T32EY007031-36NEI NIH HHS EY018585NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018585NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007031NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perineuronal nets (PNNs) are extracellular molecules that form around neurons near the end of critical periods during development. They surround neuronal cell bodies and proximal dendrites. PNNs inhibit the formation of new connections and may concentrate around rapidly firing inhibitory interneurons. Previous work characterized the important role of perineuronal nets in plasticity in the visual system, amygdala, and spinal cord of rats. In this study, we use immunohistochemistry to survey the distribution of perineuronal nets in representative areas of the primate brain. We also document changes in PNN prevalence in these areas in animals of different ages. We found that PNNs are most prevalent in the cerebellar nuclei, surrounding >90% of the neurons there. They are much less prevalent in cerebral cortex, surrounding less than 10% of neurons in every area that we examined. The incidence of perineuronal nets around parvalbumin-positive neurons (putative fast-spiking interneurons) varies considerably between different areas in the brain. Our survey indicates that the presence of PNNs may not have a simple relationship with neural plasticity and may serve multiple functions in the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityAcetylgalactosamineAnimalsBrainExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsRatsSpinal CordSynapsesAcetylgalactosamineExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26881119
PMCPMC4735937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.