Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26881012›Full record

ReviewOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2016

Reactive Oxygen Species and Targeted Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Lun Zhang, Jiahui Li, Liang Zong, Xin Chen, Ke Chen, Zhengdong Jiang, Ligang Nan, Xuqi Li, Wei Li, Tao Shan and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospective comparison of (4S)-4-(3-European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Building of CuOPharmaceutics · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lun ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-3971
Jiahui LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1845-9234
Liang ZongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3330-4735
Xin ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0509-7510
Ke ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3148-9921
Zhengdong JiangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0234-5478
Ligang NanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-9158
Xuqi LiDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2497-020X
Wei LiDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-3230
Tao ShanDepartment of General Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6680-9302
Qingyong MaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8977-320X
Zhenhua MaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-0991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generally increased in pancreatic cancer cells compared with normal cells. ROS plays a vital role in various cellular biological activities including proliferation, growth, apoptosis, and invasion. Besides, ROS participates in tumor microenvironment orchestration. The role of ROS is a doubled-edged sword in pancreatic cancer. The dual roles of ROS depend on the concentration. ROS facilitates carcinogenesis and cancer progression with mild-to-moderate elevated levels, while excessive ROS damages cancer cells dramatically and leads to cell death. Based on the recent knowledge, either promoting ROS generation to increase the concentration of ROS with extremely high levels or enhancing ROS scavenging ability to decrease ROS levels may benefit the treatment of pancreatic cancer. However, when faced with oxidative stress, the antioxidant programs of cancer cells have been activated to help cancer cells to survive in the adverse condition. Furthermore, ROS signaling and antioxidant programs play the vital roles in the progression of pancreatic cancer and in the response to cancer treatment. Eventually, it may be the novel target for various strategies and drugs to modulate ROS levels in pancreatic cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsApoptosisCarcinogenesisDisease ProgressionDNA DamageHumansOxidative StressPancreatic NeoplasmsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID26881012
PMCPMC4735911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.