Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880997›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2016

Stem Cell Imaging: Tools to Improve Cell Delivery and Viability.

Junxin Wang, Jesse V Jokerst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. International journal of stem cells · 2023
    Review
  6. ACS nano · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stem Cell Tracking with Nanoparticle-Based Ultrasound Contrast Agents.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Junxin WangDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0448, USA.
Jesse V JokerstDepartment of Nanoengineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0448, USA.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

A Therapeutic Tool for Ultrasound-Guided Stem Cell TherapyR00HL117048 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI JOKERST, JESSE VINCENT · 2015 to 2017
$747k
A Therapeutic Tool for ULtrasound-Guided Stem Cell TherapyK99HL117048 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JOKERST, JESSE VINCENT · 2014 to 2015
$265k
NHLBI NIH HHS K99 HL117048NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL117048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell therapy (SCT) has shown very promising preclinical results in a variety of regenerative medicine applications. Nevertheless, the complete utility of this technology remains unrealized. Imaging is a potent tool used in multiple stages of SCT and this review describes the role that imaging plays in cell harvest, cell purification, and cell implantation, as well as a discussion of how imaging can be used to assess outcome in SCT. We close with some perspective on potential growth in the field.

Identifiers

PMID26880997
PMCPMC4736428
OpenAlexW2232391848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.