Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880935›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2016

Cancer Stem Cell Signaling during Repopulation in Head and Neck Cancer.

George D Wilson, Bryan J Thibodeau, Laura E Fortier, Barbara L Pruetz, Sandra Galoforo, Brian Marples, Andrew M Baschnagel, Jan Akervall, Jiayi Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radioresistance Mechanisms in Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

George D WilsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA; Beaumont BioBank, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Bryan J ThibodeauBeaumont BioBank, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Laura E FortierBeaumont BioBank, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Barbara L PruetzBeaumont BioBank, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Sandra GaloforoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Brian MarplesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Andrew M BaschnagelDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
Jan AkervallBeaumont BioBank, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48703, USA.
Jiayi HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate cancer stem signaling during the repopulation response of a head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) xenograft after radiation treatment. Xenografts were generated from low passage HNSCC cells and were treated with either sham radiation or 15 Gy in one fraction. At different time points, days 0, 3, and 10 for controls and days 4, 7, 12, and 21, after irradiation, 3 tumors per group were harvested for global gene expression, pathway analysis, and immunohistochemical evaluation. 316 genes were identified that were associated with a series of stem cell-related genes and were differentially expressed (p ≤ 0.01 and 1.5-fold) at a minimum of one time point in UT-SCC-14 xenografts after radiation. The largest network of genes that showed significant changes after irradiation was associated with CD44, NOTCH1, and MET. c-MET and ALDH1A3 staining correlated with the changes in gene expression. A clear pattern emerged that was consistent with the growth inhibition data in that genes associated with stem cell pathways were most active at day 7 and day 12 after irradiation. The MET/CD44 axis seemed to be an important component of the repopulation response.

Identifiers

PMID26880935
PMCPMC4736761
OpenAlexW2224008933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.