Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880839›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Complementary approaches to diagnosing marine diseases: a union of the modern and the classic.

Colleen A Burge, Carolyn S Friedman, Rodman Getchell, Marcia House, Kevin D Lafferty, Laura D Mydlarz, Katherine C Prager, Kathryn P Sutherland, Tristan Renault, Ikunari Kiryu and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Strategies for managing marine disease.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Viral discovery in the 'realm' of COVID-19.Environmental microbiology reports · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Managing marine disease emergencies in an era of rapid change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  14. Managing marine mollusc diseases in the context of regional and international commerce: policy issues and emerging concerns.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  15. Infectious diseases in oyster aquaculture require a new integrated approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  16. Marine disease impacts, diagnosis, forecasting, management and policy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  17. Fishing diseased abalone to promote yield and conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  18. Infectious diseases of marine molluscs and host responses as revealed by genomic tools.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  19. Shifting white pox aetiologies affecting Acropora palmata in the Florida Keys, 1994-2014.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Colleen A BurgeInstitute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 701 E Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA colleenb@umbc.edu.
Carolyn S FriedmanSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Box 355020, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Rodman GetchellDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, C4-177 Vet Med Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, 930 Campus Road, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Marcia HouseNorthwest Indian Fisheries Commission, 6730 Martin Way East, Olympia, WA 98516, USA.
Kevin D LaffertyUS Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, c/o Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7583-4593
Laura D MydlarzDepartment of Biology, University of Texas Arlington, 501 South Nedderman, Arlington, TX 76019, USA.
Katherine C PragerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Kathryn P SutherlandDepartment of Biology, Rollins College, Winter Park, FL 32789, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-1500
Tristan RenaultIfremer, Département Ressources Biologiques et Environnement, rue de l'Ile d'Yeu, 44311 Nantes Cedex 03, France.
Ikunari KiryuNational Research Institute of Aquaculture, Fisheries Research Agency, Mie 516-0193, Japan.
Rebecca Vega-ThurberOregon State University, 454 Nash Hall, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
Cornell University · USIfremer · FRJapan Fisheries Research and Education Agency · JPNational Institutes of Health · USNorthwest Indian Fisheries Commission · USOregon State University · USRollins College · USThe University of Texas at Arlington · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

PHS HHS EF1015032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking marine epizootics to a specific aetiology is notoriously difficult. Recent diagnostic successes show that marine disease diagnosis requires both modern, cutting-edge technology (e.g. metagenomics, quantitative real-time PCR) and more classic methods (e.g. transect surveys, histopathology and cell culture). Here, we discuss how this combination of traditional and modern approaches is necessary for rapid and accurate identification of marine diseases, and emphasize how sole reliance on any one technology or technique may lead disease investigations astray. We present diagnostic approaches at different scales, from the macro (environment, community, population and organismal scales) to the micro (tissue, organ, cell and genomic scales). We use disease case studies from a broad range of taxa to illustrate diagnostic successes from combining traditional and modern diagnostic methods. Finally, we recognize the need for increased capacity of centralized databases, networks, data repositories and contingency plans for diagnosis and management of marine disease.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsEcosystemEnvironmental Monitoringaetiologydiagnosticsmarine diseasemarine epizootics

Identifiers

PMID26880839
PMCPMC4760137
OpenAlexW2276864902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.