Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880778›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2017

Assessing the Contribution of Malaria Vector Control and Other Maternal and Child Health Interventions in Reducing All-Cause Under-Five Mortality in Zambia, 1990-2010.

Marie Ng, K Ellicott Colson, Nancy Fullman, Laura Dwyer-Lindgren, Tom Achoki, Matthew T Schneider, Peter Mulenga, Peter Hangoma, Felix Masiye, Emmanuela Gakidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In Response.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
  18. Disease Priorities in Zambia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie NgInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
K Ellicott ColsonUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Nancy FullmanInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Laura Dwyer-LindgrenInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Tom AchokiInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Matthew T SchneiderUnited States Agency for International Development, Washington, District of Columbia.
Peter MulengaClinton Health Access Initiative, Lusaka, Zambia.
Peter HangomaDepartment of Economics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Felix MasiyeInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Emmanuela GakidouInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-five mortality in Zambia has declined since 1990, with reductions accelerating after 2000. Zambia's scale-up of malaria control is viewed as the driver of these gains, but past studies have not fully accounted for other potential factors. This study sought to systematically evaluate the impact of malaria vector control on under-five mortality. Using a mixed-effects regression model, we quantified the relationship between malaria vector control, other priority health interventions, and socioeconomic indicators and district-level under-five mortality trends from 1990 to 2010. We then conducted counterfactual analyses to estimate under-five mortality in the absence of scaling up malaria vector control. Throughout Zambia, increased malaria vector control coverage coincided with scaling up three other interventions: the pentavalent vaccine, exclusive breast-feeding, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV services. This simultaneous scale-up made statistically isolating intervention-specific impact infeasible. Instead, in combination, these interventions jointly accelerated declines in under-five mortality by 11% between 2000 and 2010. Zambia's scale-up of multiple interventions is notable, yet our findings highlight challenges in quantifying program-specific impact without better health data and information systems. As countries aim to further improve health outcomes, there is even greater need-and opportunity-to strengthen routine data systems and to develop more rigorous evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

Child MortalityInfant MortalityInsecticide-Treated BednetsMosquito VectorsCause of DeathChild HealthChild, PreschoolHealth Impact AssessmentHumansInfantInsecticidesMalariaMaternal HealthModels, StatisticalMosquito ControlSocioeconomic FactorsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID26880778
PMCPMC5619928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.