Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880774›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2016

Detection of Onchocerca volvulus in Skin Snips by Microscopy and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction: Implications for Monitoring and Evaluation Activities.

Elizabeth A Thiele, Vitaliano A Cama, Thomson Lakwo, Sindeaw Mekasha, Francisca Abanyie, Markos Sleshi, Amha Kebede, Paul T Cantey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Procedure for Handling and Storage ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Duplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Clinical Differentiation ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of Diagnostic Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth A ThieleParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Vitaliano A CamaParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia vcama@cdc.gov.
Thomson LakwoParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sindeaw MekashaParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Francisca AbanyieParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Markos SleshiParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Amha KebedeParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Paul T CanteyParasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic evaluation of skin biopsies is the monitoring and evaluation (M and E) method currently used by multiple onchocerciasis elimination programs in Africa. However, as repeated mass drug administration suppresses microfilarial loads, the sensitivity and programmatic utility of skin snip microscopy is expected to decrease. Using a pan-filarial real-time polymerase chain reaction with melt curve analysis (qPCR-MCA), we evaluated 1) the use of a single-step molecular assay for detecting and identifying Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae in residual skin snips and 2) the sensitivity of skin snip microscopy relative to qPCR-MCA. Skin snips were collected and examined with routine microscopy in hyperendemic regions of Uganda and Ethiopia (N= 500 each) and "residual" skin snips (tissue remaining after induced microfilarial emergence) were tested with qPCR-MCA. qPCR-MCA detected Onchocerca DNA in 223 residual snips: 139 of 147 microscopy(+) and 84 among microscopy(-) snips, suggesting overall sensitivity of microscopy was 62.3% (139/223) relative to qPCR-MCA (75.6% in Uganda and 28.6% in Ethiopia). These findings demonstrate the insufficient sensitivity of skin snip microscopy for reliable programmatic monitoring. Molecular tools such as qPCR-MCA can augment sensitivity and provide diagnostic confirmation of skin biopsies and will be useful for evaluation or validation of new onchocerciasis M and E tools.

Indexed as

Onchocerca volvulusAnimalsBiopsyChildEthiopiaHumansMicroscopyOnchocerciasisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySkinUganda

Identifiers

PMID26880774
PMCPMC4824238
OpenAlexW2296935725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.