Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880695›Full record

SynthesisJournal of telemedicine and telecare2017

Do weight management interventions delivered by online social networks effectively improve body weight, body composition, and chronic disease risk factors? A systematic review.

Erik A Willis, Amanda N Szabo-Reed, Lauren T Ptomey, Felicia L Steger, Jeffery J Honas, Richard A Washburn, Joseph E Donnelly

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: a mixed-methods systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moving Food Assistance into the Digital Age: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erik A WillisCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Amanda N Szabo-ReedCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Lauren T PtomeyCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Felicia L StegerCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Jeffery J HonasCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Richard A WashburnCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Joseph E DonnellyCardiovascular Research Institute, Division of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, USA.

Funding

Prevention of weight regain (POWeR) and cognitive funtionF32DK103493 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SZABO-REED, AMANDA N. · 2014 to 2016
$172k
NIDDK NIH HHS F32 DK103493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Currently, no systematic review/meta-analysis has examined studies that used online social networks (OSN) as a primary intervention platform. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of weight management interventions delivered through OSN. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (January 1990-November 2015) for studies with data on the effect of OSNs on weight loss. Only primary source articles that utilized OSN as the main platform for delivery of weight management/healthy lifestyle interventions, were published in English language peer-reviewed journals, and reported outcome data on weight were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Five articles were included in this review. Results One-hundred percent of the studies ( n = 5) reported a reduction in baseline weight. Three of the five studies (60%) reported significant decreases in body weight when OSN was paired with health educator support. Only one study reported a clinical significant weight loss of ≥5%. Conclusion Using OSN for weight management is in its early stages of development and, while these few studies show promise, more research is needed to acquire information about optimizing these interventions to increase their efficacy.

Indexed as

Social MediaAdultBody CompositionChronic DiseaseHumansRisk Reduction BehaviorSocial SupportTreatment OutcomeWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsobesitySocial mediasystematic reviewweight loss

Identifiers

PMID26880695
PMCPMC4985486
OpenAlexW2285620193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.