Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880408›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2016

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.

Raju Chelluri, Amichai Kilchevsky, Arvin K George, Abhinav Sidana, Thomas P Frye, Daniel Su, Michele Fascelli, Richard Ho, Steven F Abboud, Baris Turkbey and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Yield of second-round MRI targeted ultrasound-guided fusion prostate biopsy after initial first-round targeted biopsy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Raju ChelluriUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Amichai KilchevskyUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Arvin K GeorgeUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abhinav SidanaUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Thomas P FryeUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Daniel SuUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michele FascelliUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Richard HoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Steven F AbboudUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Maria J MerinoLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter L ChoykeMolecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Bradford J WoodCenter for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter A PintoUrologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: pintop@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Center for Interventional OncologyZIDBC011242 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WOOD, BRADFORD J · 2009 to 2025
$18.7M
Prostate SectionZIABC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$15.2M
Prostate SectionZ01BC011081 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PINTO, PETER · 2008 to 2008
$99k
Interventional OncologyZIACL040015 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI WOOD, BRADFORD · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC011081Intramural NIH HHS ZID BC011242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUrologists face a dilemma when a lesion identified on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging is benign on image guided fusion biopsy. We investigated the detection rate of prostate cancer on repeat fusion biopsy in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions initially found to be pathologically benign on fusion biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed the records of all patients from 2007 to 2014 who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and image guided fusion biopsy. We identified men who underwent rebiopsy of the same discrete lesion after initial fusion biopsy results were benign. Data were documented on a per lesion basis. We manually reviewed UroNav system (Invivo, Gainesville, Florida) needle tracking to verify accurate image registration. Multivariate analysis was used to identify clinical and imaging factors predictive of prostate cancer detection at repeat fusion biopsy.

resultsA total of 131 unique lesions were rebiopsied in 90 patients. Of these 131 resampled lesions 21 (16%) showed prostate cancer, which in 13 (61.9%) was Gleason 3 + 3. On multivariate analysis only lesion growth on repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was significantly associated with prostate cancer detection at repeat biopsy (HR 3.274, 95% CI 1.205-8.896, p = 0.02).

conclusionsPathologically benign multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions on initial image guided fusion biopsy are rarely found to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. When prostate cancer was identified, most disease was low risk. An increase in lesion diameter was an independent predictor of prostate cancer detection. While these data are retrospective, they may provide some confidence in the reliability of negative initial image guided fusion biopsies despite a positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding.

Indexed as

AdultAgedHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Interventionalhigh-intensity focusedimage-guided biopsymagnetic resonance imagingprostatic neoplasmstransrectalultrasoundwatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID26880408
PMCPMC7830711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.