ArticleJournal of molecular biology2016
High-Resolution Mapping of the Folding Transition State of a WW Domain.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Backbone double-mutant cycle analysis quantifies hydrogen-bond energies in proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Atomic-level thermodynamics analysis of the binding free energy of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.Proteins · 2023Article
- Identification of novel functional mini-receptors by combinatorial screening of split-WW domains.Chemical science · 2022Article
- New Insights into Folding, Misfolding, and Nonfolding Dynamics of a WW Domain.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Adaptive Markov state model estimation using short reseeding trajectories.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
- Using Cooperatively Folded Peptides To Measure Interaction Energies and Conformational Propensities.Accounts of chemical research · 2017Article
- The Dependence of Carbohydrate-Aromatic Interaction Strengths on the Structure of the Carbohydrate.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fast-folding WW domains are among the best-characterized systems for comparing experiments and simulations of protein folding. Recent microsecond-resolution experiments and long duration (totaling milliseconds) single-trajectory modeling have shown that even mechanistic changes in folding kinetics due to mutation can now be analyzed. Thus, a comprehensive set of experimental data would be helpful to benchmark the predictions made by simulations. Here, we use T-jump relaxation in conjunction with protein engineering and report mutational Φ-values (Φ(M)) as indicators for folding transition-state structure of 65 side chain, 7 backbone hydrogen bond, and 6 deletion and /or insertion mutants within loop 1 of the 34-residue hPin1 WW domain. Forty-five cross-validated consensus mutants could be identified that provide structural constraints for transition-state structure within all substructures of the WW domain fold (hydrophobic core, loop 1, loop 2, β-sheet). We probe the robustness of the two hydrophobic clusters in the folding transition state, discuss how local backbone disorder in the native-state can lead to non-classical Φ(M)-values (Φ(M) > 1) in the rate-determining loop 1 substructure, and conclusively identify mutations and positions along the sequence that perturb the folding mechanism from loop 1-limited toward loop 2-limited folding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.