Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26880152›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2016

Enablers and barriers for implementing high-quality hypertension care in a rural primary care setting in Nigeria: perspectives of primary care staff and health insurance managers.

Aina O Odusola, Karien Stronks, Marleen E Hendriks, Constance Schultsz, Tanimola Akande, Akin Osibogun, Henk van Weert, Joke A Haafkens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aina O OdusolaDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marleen E HendriksDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Constance SchultszDepartment of Global Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanimola AkandeDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Akin OsibogunDepartment of Community Health, Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
Henk van WeertDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joke A HaafkensDepartment of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Stroke and Cardiovascular Research Training (SCaRT) InstituteD43TW009140 · FIC · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ADANU, RICHARD M K, ALABI, SULYMAN BIODUN · 2011 to 2023
$2.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is a highly prevalent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) that can be modified through timely and long-term treatment in primary care.

objectiveWe explored perspectives of primary care staff and health insurance managers on enablers and barriers for implementing high-quality hypertension care, in the context of a community-based health insurance programme in rural Nigeria.

designQualitative study using semi-structured individual interviews with primary care staff (n = 11) and health insurance managers (n=4). Data were analysed using standard qualitative techniques.

resultsBoth stakeholder groups perceived health insurance as an important facilitator for implementing high-quality hypertension care because it covered costs of care for patients and provided essential resources and incentives to clinics: guidelines, staff training, medications, and diagnostic equipment. Perceived inhibitors included the following: high staff workload; administrative challenges at facilities; discordance between healthcare provider and insurer on how health insurance and provider payment methods work; and insufficient fit between some guideline recommendations and tools for patient education and characteristics/needs of the local patient population. Perceived strategies to address inhibitors included the following: task-shifting; adequate provider payment benchmarking; good provider-insurer relationships; automated administration systems; and tailoring guidelines/patient education.

conclusionsBy providing insights into perspectives of primary care providers and health insurance managers, this study offers information on potential strategies for implementing high-quality hypertension care for insured patients in SSA.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelInsurance, HealthPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAttitude of Health PersonnelCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk Factorscommunity-based health insurancehypertensionprimary carequalitative studystakeholder perspectivessub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID26880152
PMCPMC4754020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.