Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879946›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2016

Independent prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary computed tomography angiography in an outpatient cohort of low to intermediate risk chest pain patients.

M J Bom, P M Van der Zee, F M Van der Zant, R J J Knol, J H Cornel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring in Stable Chest Pain Patients: A Narrative Review.RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Multimodality imaging: Bird's eye view from The European Society of Cardiology Congress 2015 London, August 29-September 2, 2015.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J BomDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands. bommichiel@gmail.com.
P M Van der ZeeDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
F M Van der ZantDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
R J J KnolDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
J H CornelDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Alkmaar · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited studies report on the additional prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and the coronary artery calcium score (CACS).

methodsFor a median of 637 days, 1551 outpatients with chest pain, without known coronary artery disease (CAD) and low or intermediate pre-test probability of CAD, were followed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction or late revascularisation. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the independent prognostic value of CCTA and CACS.

resultsMACE occurred in 23 patients (1.5 %): death (3, 0.2 %), myocardial infarction (4, 0.3 %) and late revascularisation (16, 1.3 %). Multivariate analysis showed an independent prognostic value of CCTA (p < 0.001), CACS of 100-400 (p = 0.035) and CACS of > 400 (p = 0.021). CCTA showed obstructive CAD in 3.1 % of patients with CACS = 0. No events occurred in patients with CACS = 0 without obstructive CAD at CCTA, whereas 2/23 patients (9 %) with CACS = 0 with obstructive CAD had a MACE.

conclusionsOur study shows that both CCTA and higher CACS categories have independent prognostic value in chest pain patients with low to intermediate pre-test probability of obstructive CAD, in which CCTA is appropriate. Furthermore a non-negligible amount of patients with CACS = 0 have obstructive CAD at CCTA. CCTA can be used in these patients to identify those at risk for MACE.

Indexed as

CACSCCTACoronary artery calciumCoronary computed tomography angiographyMACEPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26879946
PMCPMC4840119
OpenAlexW2338240513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.