ArticleBMC geriatrics2016
Validation of the Sour Seven Questionnaire for screening delirium in hospitalized seniors by informal caregivers and untrained nurses.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Family-Partnered Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Management in Critically Ill Adults: The Activating Family Caregivers in the Identification Prevention and Management of Delirium (ACTIVATE) Study.Critical care explorations · 2025Trial
- Development and Validation of the Family ICU Delirium Detection Instrument.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Quality of Delirium Website Content for Patient and Family Education: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Optimizing ChatGPT's Interpretation and Reporting of Delirium Assessment Outcomes: Exploratory Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Translation, cultural debugging, and validation of the Chinese version of the Sour Seven Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Recognition of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia: Is There an Ideal Tool?Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Commentary: Prevention and management of delirium in older Australians: The need for the integration of carers as partners in care.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- Detecting delirium in nursing home residents using the Informant Assessment of Geriatric Delirium (I-AGeD): a validation pilot study.European geriatric medicine · 2022Article
- Delirium diagnosis without a gold standard: Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of combined delirium assessment tools.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- The impact of patient delirium in the intensive care unit: patterns of anxiety symptoms in family caregivers.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Associations between caregiver-detected delirium and symptoms of depression and anxiety in family caregivers of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Patients, family members and providers perceive family-administered delirium detection tools in the adult ICU as feasible and of value to patient care and family member coping: a qualitative focus group study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of an intensive care unit family education intervention on delirium knowledge: a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2020Article
- Negative Studies Should Inform Our Research and Care: Engaging Family Members in the Care of the Critically Ill.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of family-partnered delirium prevention, detection, and management in critically ill adults: the ACTIVATE study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Family Identification of Delirium in the Emergency Department in Patients With and Without Dementia: Validity of the Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM).Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
- Polypharmacy in palliative care-COPD and multimorbidity : A case report.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2018Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a common condition in hospitalized seniors that nonetheless often goes undetected by nurses or is delayed in being detected which negatively impacts quality of care and outcomes. We sought to develop a new screening tool for delirium, The Sour Seven Questionnaire, a 7-item questionnaire suitable to be completed from informal or untrained caregiver observation. The study aimed to develop the scoring criteria for a positive delirium screen and assess concurrent validity of the questionnaire against a geriatric psychiatrist's assessment.
methodsA pilot study of 80 hospitalized seniors over age 65 recruited from three units (2 medical, 1 orthopedic). Participants were assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) with a brief cognitive screen and the Sour Seven Questionnaire posed to the appointed informal caregiver (family member) or untrained nurse for up-to 7 days. Subjects testing positive on the CAM and a random sample of negatively CAM screened subjects were assessed by the geriatric psychiatrist.
resultsFrom 80 participants, 21 screened positive for delirium on the CAM. 18 of the 21 CAM positive screens were diagnosed to have delirium by the geriatric psychiatrist, and 17 of the 18 randomly assigned negative CAM screens were confirmed as not having delirium. From the questionnaires on these 39 participants, weighted scoring for each of the 7 questions of the Sour Seven Questionnaire was developed based on their relative risks for correctly predicting delirium when compared to the geriatric psychiatrist's clinical assessment. Total scoring of the questionnaire resulted in the following positive predictive values for delirium: 89% with a total score of 4 (sensitivity 89.5%, specificity 90%), and 100% with a total score of 9 (sensitivity 63.2%, specificity 100%). Comparison between scoring on questionnaires posed to informal caregivers versus untrained nurses showed no differences.
conclusionA weighted score of 4 in the Sour Seven Questionnaire has concurrent validity as a screening tool for delirium and a score of 9 is diagnostic for delirium. The Sour Seven Questionnaire is the first screening tool for delirium shown to be suitable for use by informal caregivers and untrained nurses in hospitalized seniors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.