ArticleEJNMMI physics2016
Recent developments in time-of-flight PET.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 354 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sensitivity, Specificity and the Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT for Axillary Staging in Patients With Stage I-III Cancer: A Systematic Review of The Literature.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- Head-to-head comparison ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Comparison among Reconstruction Algorithms for Quantitative Analysis ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Trial
- Attenuation Pre-Correction in Iterative PET Image Reconstruction: What is the Statistical Cost?IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- Simulation study of wedge-shaped light guide for compensating depth-of-interaction induced timing uncertainty in Cherenkov radiator.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A single-chip, dual-gain color-NIR camera for fluorescence-guided lung and breast cancer surgery.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- (Hybrid) SPECT and PET Technologies.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Reducing acquisition time in O-(2-Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Impact ofEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Optimizing LM-DRAMA parameters and non-local means filtering to improve small-lesion detectability in SiPM-based TOF breast PET.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of reducedAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Implantation of an Artificial Intelligence Denoising Algorithm Using SubtlePET™ with Various Radiotracers: 18F-FDG, 68Ga PSMA-11 and 18F-FDOPA, Impact on the Technologist Radiation Doses.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Improving patient specific quality assurance for image registration: clinical use case of target contouring for PET deformable image registration.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Dual-ended readout TOF-DOI PET detectors based on 3.2 mm and 1.6 mm pitch LYSO arrays.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Performance evaluation of a medium axial field-of-view sparse PET system based on flat panels of monolithic LYSO detectors: a simulation study.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- A Time-Walk and Timing-Shift Correction Method for Dual-Ended Readout TOF-DOI PET Detectors.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- ASICs in PET: what we have and what we need.EJNMMI physics · 2025Review
- Article
- Cross-Detection for Bubble-free Thermometer Codes and Dual-Side Monitoring for FPGA-Based High-Accuracy and High-Precision Time-to-Digital Converters.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2025Article
- Current status and upcoming developments for online adaptive proton therapy enabling a closed feedback loop for near real-time adaptation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the first time-of-flight (TOF)-positron emission tomography (PET) systems were already built in the early 1980s, limited clinical studies were acquired on these scanners. PET was still a research tool, and the available TOF-PET systems were experimental. Due to a combination of low stopping power and limited spatial resolution (caused by limited light output of the scintillators), these systems could not compete with bismuth germanate (BGO)-based PET scanners. Developments on TOF system were limited for about a decade but started again around 2000. The combination of fast photomultipliers, scintillators with high density, modern electronics, and faster computing power for image reconstruction have made it possible to introduce this principle in clinical TOF-PET systems. This paper reviews recent developments in system design, image reconstruction, corrections, and the potential in new applications for TOF-PET. After explaining the basic principles of time-of-flight, the difficulties in detector technology and electronics to obtain a good and stable timing resolution are shortly explained. The available clinical systems and prototypes under development are described in detail. The development of this type of PET scanner also requires modified image reconstruction with accurate modeling and correction methods. The additional dimension introduced by the time difference motivates a shift from sinogram- to listmode-based reconstruction. This reconstruction is however rather slow and therefore rebinning techniques specific for TOF data have been proposed. The main motivation for TOF-PET remains the large potential for image quality improvement and more accurate quantification for a given number of counts. The gain is related to the ratio of object size and spatial extent of the TOF kernel and is therefore particularly relevant for heavy patients, where image quality degrades significantly due to increased attenuation (low counts) and high scatter fractions. The original calculations for the gain were based on analytical methods. Recent publications for iterative reconstruction have shown that it is difficult to quantify TOF gain into one factor. The gain depends on the measured distribution, the location within the object, and the count rate. In a clinical situation, the gain can be used to either increase the standardized uptake value (SUV) or reduce the image acquisition time or administered dose. The localized nature of the TOF kernel makes it possible to utilize local tomography reconstruction or to separate emission from transmission data. The introduction of TOF also improves the joint estimation of transmission and emission images from emission data only. TOF is also interesting for new applications of PET-like isotopes with low branching ratio for positron fraction. The local nature also reduces the need for fine angular sampling, which makes TOF interesting for limited angle situations like breast PET and online dose imaging in proton or hadron therapy. The aim of this review is to introduce the reader in an educational way into the topic of TOF-PET and to give an overview of the benefits and new opportunities in using this additional information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.