Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879862›Full record

GuidelineJournal of gastroenterology2016

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2015.

Kiichi Satoh, Junji Yoshino, Taiji Akamatsu, Toshiyuki Itoh, Mototsugu Kato, Tomoari Kamada, Atsushi Takagi, Toshimi Chiba, Sachiyo Nomura, Yuji Mizokami and 10 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Clinical Guidelines for Drug-induced Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020
    Guideline
  3. Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Acid peptic disorder compass: An Indian expert consensus on comprehensive management.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kiichi SatohDepartment of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, 537-3 Iguchi, Nasushiobara-shi, Tochigi, 329-2763, Japan. kiichi@iuhw.ac.jp.
Junji YoshinoGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Taiji AkamatsuGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Toshiyuki ItohGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Mototsugu KatoGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Tomoari KamadaGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Atsushi TakagiGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Toshimi ChibaGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Sachiyo NomuraGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Yuji MizokamiGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Kazunari MurakamiGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Choitsu SakamotoGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Hideyuki HiraishiGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Masao IchinoseGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Naomi UemuraGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Hidemi GotoGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Takashi JohGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Hiroto MiwaGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Kentaro SuganoGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.
Tooru ShimosegawaGuidelines Committee for creating and evaluating the "Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer", the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE), K-18 Building 8F, 8-9-13, Ginza, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-0061, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology (JSGE) revised the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease in 2014 and has created an English version. The revised guidelines consist of seven items: bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcers, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy, non-eradication therapy, drug-induced ulcer, non-H. pylori, non-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ulcer, surgical treatment, and conservative therapy for perforation and stenosis. Ninety clinical questions (CQs) were developed, and a literature search was performed for the CQs using the Medline, Cochrane, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases between 1983 and June 2012. The guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Therapy is initially provided for ulcer complications. Perforation or stenosis is treated with surgery or conservatively. Ulcer bleeding is first treated by endoscopic hemostasis. If it fails, surgery or interventional radiology is chosen. Second, medical therapy is provided. In cases of NSAID-related ulcers, use of NSAIDs is stopped, and anti-ulcer therapy is provided. If NSAID use must continue, the ulcer is treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or prostaglandin analog. In cases with no NSAID use, H. pylori-positive patients receive eradication and anti-ulcer therapy. If first-line eradication therapy fails, second-line therapy is given. In cases of non-H. pylori, non-NSAID ulcers or H. pylori-positive patients with no indication for eradication therapy, non-eradication therapy is provided. The first choice is PPI therapy, and the second choice is histamine 2-receptor antagonist therapy. After initial therapy, maintenance therapy is provided to prevent ulcer relapse.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsDrug Therapy, CombinationEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEvidence-Based MedicineHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHemostasis, EndoscopicHumansPeptic UlcerPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageProton Pump InhibitorsRecurrenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAnti-Ulcer AgentsCyclooxygenase 2 InhibitorsProton Pump InhibitorsCyclooxygenase-2Duodenal ulcerGastric ulcerHelicobacter pylori eradicationLow-dose aspirinNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugPeptic ulcerStomach ulcer

Identifiers

PMID26879862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.