Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879830›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Teaching research: a programme to develop research capacity in undergraduate medical students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Stephen E Knight, Jacqueline M Van Wyk, Saajida Mahomed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Guiding the emerging primary care researcher: A report of research capacity-building workshop.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The impact of sensitizing 1Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen E KnightSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Room 217 George Campbell Building, Durban, 4041, South Africa. knights@ukzn.ac.za.
Jacqueline M Van WykSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. vanwykj2@ukzn.ac.za.
Saajida MahomedSchool of Laboratory and Laboratory Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. mahomeds@ukzn.ac.za.

Funding

ENHANCING, TRAINING, RESEARCH CAPACITY AND EXPERTISE IN HIV CARE-ENTREER24TW008863 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BOBAT, RAZIYA, HAMMER, SCOTT M · 2010 to 2015
$8.6M
FIC NIH HHS 5R24TW008863FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008863PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved research ability is a core competency to achieve in health professionals. The Selectives is a three-year, longitudinal, community-based programme within the undergraduate curriculum which aims to develop research capacity in all medical students during the prescribed curriculum. In relation to the programme, the authors describe the types of studies conducted by students, conditions that facilitated their learning, how the experience improved students' knowledge of research and public health and their development of reflective learning practices.

methodsA cohort of 212 students completed the Selectives Programme in 2014, and 69 (32 %) completed an anonymous online evaluation thereafter. Data collected include students' perceptions of the research component of Selectives; its impact on their knowledge of research and a documentary analysis of their research protocols and posters. Ethical approval for the ongoing evaluation of the Selectives was sought and obtained from the institutional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee.

resultsDuring Selectives, 75 groups of 2-4 students conducted research studies of primary health care problems in community settings. Each group is assessed on their presentation of research findings as a scientific poster. The Selectives facilitated learning for the majority of the cohort. Students reported positive learning experiences about the research process, including ethics; protocol writing; data processing; dissemination of findings and results; and their use in informing a health promotion intervention. Students reported having gained a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses through reflective learning from this academic activity. The Selectives is scheduled adjacent to the students' mid-year vacation. This scheduling together with the placement in the students' home community minimizes travel and accommodation costs associated with working outside the academic teaching platform and therefore makes it a cost-effective model in a low resource context.

conclusionsThe Selectives has proven beneficial to develop a range of generic and practical research competencies for a full cohort of students enrolled in the undergraduate medical curriculum. The Selectives research process is integrated with learning about population health and the social determinants of health in a primary health care setting.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningProfessional CompetenceSouth AfricaStudents, MedicalYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26879830
PMCPMC4754994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.