Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879825›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Attitudes and preferences toward monitoring symptoms, distress, and quality of life in glioma patients and their informal caregivers.

Florien W Boele, Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan, Karen Hilverda, Jaap C Reijneveld, Wilmy Cleijne, Martin Klein, Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The effects of SmartCareSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Research on cognitive and sociocognitive functions in patients with brain tumours: a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the scientific landscape.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florien W BoeleDepartment of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cornelia F van Uden-KraanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, Amsterdam, HZ, Netherlands.
Karen HilverdaDepartment of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jaap C ReijneveldDepartment of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands.
Wilmy CleijneDepartment of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martin KleinDepartment of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Irma M Verdonck-de LeeuwDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, Amsterdam, HZ, Netherlands. im.verdonck@vumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGlioma patients and their informal caregivers face many challenges in living with the disease and its disease-specific consequences. To better meet their needs, a system to monitor symptoms, distress, and quality of life could prove useful. We explored glioma patients' and caregivers' attitudes and preferences toward monitoring in general and specifically toward paper-and-pencil and computerized (eHealth) options.

methodsIn total, 15 patients and 15 informal caregivers participated in individual, semi-structured interviews. Interviews were transcribed smooth verbatim and coded by two researchers independently.

resultsAdvantages of monitoring generated by participants include increased awareness of problems and their flow over time, and facilitating supportive care provision. Disadvantages include investment of time and mastering the discipline to monitor frequently. Patients reported more disadvantages of monitoring, including practical and disease-specific impediments, while caregivers mentioned more advantages. Preferences for specific methods mentioned to monitor are highly personal but most prefer to have an option for face-to-face contact to discuss results of monitoring with health care professionals even in computerized instruments.

conclusionsInformal caregivers view a monitoring system more favorably than glioma patients. In developing an efficient monitoring system to help glioma patients and caregivers find their way to supportive care, a computerized instrument with the added opportunity to contact a health care professional seems to be the best option to advise.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitudeBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeBrain tumoreHealthGliomaInformal caregiversPreferencesSupportive care needs

Identifiers

PMID26879825
PMCPMC4877415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.