ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Differences of side branch jailing between left main-left anterior descending artery stenting and left main-left circumflex artery stenting with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized comparison between 2-link cell design biolimus A9-eluting stent and 3-link cell design everolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions: the BEGIN trial.Heart and vessels · 2019Trial
- Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main coronary artery.Heart and vessels · 2021Article
- Optical coherence tomography: influence of contrast concentration on image quality and diagnostic confidence.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Evaluation of major coronary artery Bifurcation angles with digital angiography: A detailed study of prevalence in the Upper Euphrates Basin.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to indicate differences of side branch jailing between the left main (LM)-left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenting and the LM-left circumflex artery (LCx) stenting. Thirty-one patients who underwent single-stenting using a two-link ten-crowns biolimus-eluting stent (Japanese design of BES, J-BES) and subsequent kissing balloon dilation (KBD) on an LM bifurcation with optical coherence tomography (OCT) were divided into two groups according to the stented vessel. Bifurcation angles were measured by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary analysis. The jailing pattern on a side branch ostium was evaluated by stent-enhanced 3D-OCT. Incomplete stent apposition (ISA) after KBD was compared between the stented vessels. The to-be-stented angle of the LM-LCx stenting (n = 11) was significantly steeper than that of the LM-LAD stenting (n = 20) (132.6° ± 16.9° vs. 150.7° ± 10.6°, p < 0.01). The incidence of the free carina type, which has no stent links bridging from a carina, in the LM-LCx stenting was significantly higher than that in the LM-LAD stenting (90.9 vs. 45.0 %, p = 0.02). The percentage of ISA at the bifurcation segment in the LM-LCx stenting was significantly smaller than that in the LM-LAD stenting (4.4 ± 8.2 vs. 12.7 ± 9.2 %, p = 0.0003). This study showed, by higher incidence of the favorable configuration, that the LM-LCx stenting achieved a smaller percentage of ISA than the LM-LAD stenting. These insights may help guide LM bifurcation stenting with J-BES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26879743What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.