Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879638›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Positive deviance as a novel tool in malaria control and elimination: methodology, qualitative assessment and future potential.

Muhammad Shafique, Hannah M Edwards, Celine Zegers De Beyl, Bou Kheng Thavrin, Myo Min, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Narrative Review of the Control and Prevention of Knowlesi Malaria.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad ShafiqueMalaria Consortium Asia, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajavidhi Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. m.shafique@malariaconsortium.org.
Hannah M EdwardsMalaria Consortium Asia, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajavidhi Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. h.edwards@malariaconsortium.org.
Celine Zegers De BeylMalaria Consortium, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London, EC2A 4LT, UK. c.zegers@malariaconsortium.org.
Bou Kheng ThavrinCambodia's National Centre for Parasitology, Entomology and Malaria Control (CNM), Phnom Penh, Cambodia. boukhengthavrin@gmail.com.
Myo MinMyanmar Medical Association (MMA), No.249, Theinbyu Road, Mingalar Taung Nyunt Tsp, Yangon, Myanmar. qdstm.mma@gmail.com.
Arantxa Roca-FeltrerMalaria Consortium Asia, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajavidhi Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. a.roca@malariaconsortium.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositive deviance (PD) is an asset-based, community-driven approach to behaviour change that has successfully been applied to address many health and social problems. It is yet to have been assessed for malaria control but may represent a promising tool for malaria elimination given its suitability in targeting small and remote population groups, apparent sustainability and ability to instil a high amount of community mobilisation. Here, the PD methodology as applied to malaria is explained, with focus upon and qualitative assessment of a proof of concept study in Cambodia.

methodsThree villages in Battambang, northwestern Cambodia were selected for the intervention, with an estimated population of 5036 including both residents and migrant workers. In August 2010, field teams conducted a 1 week PD process to sensitise and mobilise the community, establish normative behaviours in relation to malaria control and prevention, identify positive deviant behaviours from within the community, and identify PD volunteers. Until March 2011, PD volunteers were supported by field teams via monthly meetings to conduct activities in their respective communities to increase practice of PD behaviours. In February 2012, 1 year following the end of external support, evaluative interviews were conducted with community members to qualitatively assess community acceptance and interpretation of the PD intervention, perceived behaviour changes, and perceived positive outcomes.

resultsQualitative data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews showed that the PD approach was well-accepted into the communities and created a strong sense of community empowerment. Positive behaviour change was linked to the PD intervention, including greater usage of nets by forest goers, and use of public health facilities for malaria diagnosis and treatment. One year following the end of external assistance, PD volunteers were still conducting activities in their respective communities.

conclusionsPD offers a promising tool in malaria control and elimination settings. Work is ongoing to quantitatively measure impact of PD on behaviours and malaria transmission and once gathered, national malaria control programmes should be encouraged to look at including PD as part of their national strategies. Feasibility of scale-up, cost-effectiveness, and applicability to other settings and diseases is also currently being explored.

Indexed as

CambodiaCommunity Health ServicesDisease EradicationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalariaMale

Identifiers

PMID26879638
PMCPMC4754848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.