Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879594›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of lenvatinib in healthy subjects and patients with cancer.

Anubha Gupta, Barbara Jarzab, Jaume Capdevila, Robert Shumaker, Ziad Hussein

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A Randomized, Phase III Study of Lenvatinib in Chinese Patients with Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Efficacy of lenvatinibJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  16. The importance of early-stage blood pressure control in thyroid cancer patients treated with lenvatinib from the perspective of dose intensity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anubha GuptaEisai Limited, Hatfield, UK.
Barbara JarzabDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Institute of Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland.
Jaume CapdevilaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
Robert ShumakerEisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-8540
Ziad HusseinEisai Limited, Hatfield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLenvatinib was recently approved for the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC). Here, we characterized the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of lenvatinib and identified intrinsic and extrinsic factors that explain interindividual PK variability in humans.

methodsThis population PK analysis used pooled data from 15 clinical studies, including eight phase 1 studies in healthy subjects, four phase 1 studies in patients with solid tumours, two phase 2 studies in patients with thyroid cancer and one phase 3 study in patients with RR-DTC.

resultsThe final pooled dataset included data from 779 subjects receiving 3.2-32 mg oral lenvatinib, mainly once daily as tablets or capsules. Lenvatinib PK was best described by a three-compartment model with linear elimination. Lenvatinib absorption was best described by simultaneous first- and zero-order absorption. The population mean value for lenvatinib apparent clearance (CL/F) was 6.56 l h(-1) [percent coefficient of variation (%CV) 25.5], and was independent of dose and time. The relative bioavailability of lenvatinib in capsule form was 90% vs. tablets (%CV 30.2). The final PK model included significant but marginal effects of body weight (2.8% of CL/F variation), liver-function markers [alkaline phosphatase (-11.7%) and albumin (-6.3%)] and concomitant cytochrome P450 3A4 inducers (+30%) and inhibitors (-7.8%) on lenvatinib CL/F. Lenvatinib PK was unaffected by pH-elevating agents, dose, age, sex, race, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or bilirubin levels, or renal function.

conclusionsThe significant effects of several covariates on lenvatinib PK variability were small in magnitude, and therefore were not considered clinically relevant, or to warrant any dose adjustment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiological AvailabilityFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansIndividualityMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesThyroid NeoplasmslenvatinibPhenylurea CompoundsQuinolinesdose adjustmenthepatic impairmentlenvatinibpharmacokineticspooled analysispopulation

Identifiers

PMID26879594
PMCPMC4876185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.