Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879530›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Modelling severe Staphylococcus aureus sepsis in conscious pigs: are implications for animal welfare justified?

Helle G Olsen, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen, Pernille Tveden-Nyborg, Malene M Birck, Karsten P Hammelev, Andreas Vegge, Bent Aalbæk, Páll S Leifsson, Henrik E Jensen, Tine Iburg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pediatric Swine Model of Methicillin-ResistantCritical care explorations · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Fitness of animals for transport to slaughter.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2019
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helle G OlsenDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. hellegerdaolsen@gmail.com.
Mads Kjelgaard-HansenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. mdkh@novonordisk.com.
Pernille Tveden-NyborgDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. ptn@sund.ku.dk.
Malene M BirckDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. malenemuus@hotmail.com.
Karsten P HammelevDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. kah@sund.ku.dk.
Andreas VeggeDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. aveg@novonordisk.com.
Bent AalbækDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. baal@sund.ku.dk.
Páll S LeifssonDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. ple@sund.ku.dk.
Henrik E JensenDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. helj@sund.ku.dk.
Tine IburgDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. timi@vet.dtu.dk.
Peter M H HeegaardNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksberg, Denmark. pmhh@vet.dtu.dk.
Ole L NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Disease Biology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark. oleni@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA porcine model of haematogenous Staphylococcus aureus sepsis has previously been established in our research group. In these studies, pigs developed severe sepsis including liver dysfunction during a 48 h study period. As pigs were awake during the study, animal welfare was challenged by the severity of induced disease, which in some cases necessitated humane euthanasia. A pilot study was therefore performed in order to establish the sufficient inoculum concentration and application protocol needed to produce signs of liver dysfunction within limits of our pre-defined humane endpoints.

methodsFour pigs received 1 × 10(8) cfu/kg BW of S. aureus, and two controls were sham inoculated with saline. A fixed infusion rate of 3 mL/min was used, while the inoculum concentration, i.e., the dose volume, was changed between the pigs. The following dose volumes were used: 10 mL (n = 1), 20 mL (n = 2), and 30 mL (n = 1), corresponding to infusion durations of 3.33, 6.66, and 10 min at dose rates of 3 × 10(7), 1.5 × 10(7), and 1 × 10(7) cfu/min/kg BW, respectively. Blood samples were drawn for complete blood count, clinical chemistry, and inflammatory markers before and every 6 h after inoculation. Prior to euthanasia, a galactose elimination capacity test was performed to assess liver function. Pigs were euthanised 48 h post inoculation for necropsy and histopathological evaluation.

resultsWhile infusion times of 6.66 min, and higher, did not induce liver dysfunction (n = 3), the infusion time of 3.33 min (n = 1) caused alterations in parameters similar to what had been seen in our previous studies, i.e., increasing bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase, as well as histopathological occurrence of intravascular fibrin split products in the liver. This pig was however euthanised after 30 h, according to humane endpoints.

conclusionsA usable balance between scientific purpose and animal welfare could not be achieved, and we therefore find it hard to justify further use of this conscious porcine sepsis model. In order to make a model of translational relevance for human sepsis, we suggest that future model versions should use long-term anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareConsciousnessAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGalactoseInflammationLiverLiver Function TestsSepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSus scrofaBiomarkersGalactose

Identifiers

PMID26879530
PMCPMC4755015
OpenAlexW2278373157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.