ArticleProteins2016
Mechanism and rate constants of the Cdc42 GTPase binding with intrinsically disordered effectors.
Article in Proteins, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical folding-upon-binding of an intrinsically disordered protein.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Why Does Synergistic Activation of WASP, but Not N-WASP, by Cdc42 and PIPJournal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- Cdc42/Rac Interactive Binding Containing Effector Proteins in Unicellular Protozoans With Reference to Human Host: Locks of the Rho Signaling.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Investigating Intrinsically Disordered Proteins With Brownian Dynamics.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Review
- Brownian Dynamics Simulations of Biological Molecules.Trends in chemistry · 2019Article
- Designed Mutations Alter the Binding Pathways of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Bond swapping from a charge cloud allows flexible coordination of upstream signals through WASP: Multiple regulatory roles for the WASP basic region.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- The dock-and-coalesce mechanism for the association of a WASP disordered region with the Cdc42 GTPase.The FEBS journal · 2017Article
- A dock and coalesce mechanism driven by hydrophobic interactions governs Cdc42 binding with its effector protein ACK.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017Article
- Rate Constants and Mechanisms of Protein-Ligand Binding.Annual review of biophysics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are often involved in signaling and regulatory functions, through binding to cellular targets. Many IDPs undergo disorder-to-order transitions upon binding. Both the binding mechanisms and the magnitudes of the binding rate constants can have functional importance. Previously we have found that the coupled binding and folding of any IDP generally follows a sequential mechanism that we term dock-and-coalesce, whereby one segment of the IDP first docks to its subsite on the target surface and the remaining segments subsequently coalesce around their respective subsites. Here we applied our TransComp method within the framework of the dock-and-coalesce mechanism to dissect the binding kinetics of two Rho-family GTPases, Cdc42 and TC10, with two intrinsically disordered effectors, WASP and Pak1. TransComp calculations identified the basic regions preceding the GTPase binding domains (GBDs) of the effectors as the docking segment. For Cdc42 binding with both WASP and Pak1, the calculated docking rate constants are close to the observed overall binding rate constants, suggesting that basic-region docking is the rate-limiting step and subsequent conformational coalescence of the GBDs on the Cdc42 surface is fast. The possibility that conformational coalescence of the WASP GBD on the TC10 surface is slow warrants further experimental investigation. The account for the differences in binding rate constants among the three GTPase-effector systems and mutational effects therein yields deep physical and mechanistic insight into the binding processes. Our approach may guide the selection of mutations that lead to redesigned binding pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.