Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879242›Full record

ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2016

Monitoring the biological activity of abdominal aortic aneurysms Beyond Ultrasound.

Rachael O Forsythe, David E Newby, Jennifer M J Robson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Editorial: Advances in aortic imaging.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Assessment of different quantification metrics of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Iterative reconstruction incorporating background correction improves quantification of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  18. Plasma Desmosine and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael O ForsytheBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jennifer M J RobsonBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
British Heart Foundation · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/09/002Chief Scientist Office ETM/365Medical Research Council G0701127Medical Research Council MC_PC_12040Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT103782AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are an important cause of morbidity and, when ruptured, are associated with >80% mortality. Current management decisions are based on assessment of aneurysm diameter by abdominal ultrasound. However, AAA growth is non-linear and rupture can occur at small diameters or may never occur in those with large AAAs. There is a need to develop better imaging biomarkers that can identify the potential risk of rupture independent of the aneurysm diameter. Key pathobiological processes of AAA progression and rupture include neovascularisation, necrotic inflammation, microcalcification and proteolytic degradation of the extracellular matrix. These processes represent key targets for emerging imaging techniques and may confer an increased risk of expansion or rupture over and above the known patient-related risk factors. Magnetic resonance imaging, using ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide, can identify and track hotspots of macrophage activity. Positron emission tomography, using a variety of targeted tracers, can detect areas of inflammation, angiogenesis, hypoxia and microcalcification. By going beyond the simple monitoring of diameter expansion using ultrasound, these cellular and molecular imaging techniques may have the potential to allow improved prediction of expansion or rupture and to better guide elective surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyMagnetic Resonance AngiographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyUltrasonographyAnimalsAorta, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortographyBiomarkersDilatation, PathologicDisease ProgressionHumansMacrophagesPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID26879242
PMCPMC4893091
OpenAlexW2277469488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.