Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26879185›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Identifying small groups of foods that can predict achievement of key dietary recommendations: data mining of the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey, 2008-12.

Philippe J Giabbanelli, Jean Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe J GiabbanelliUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR),MRC Epidemiology Unit,University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine,Institute of Metabolic Science,Cambridge CB2 0QQ,UK.
Jean AdamsUKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR),MRC Epidemiology Unit,University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine,Institute of Metabolic Science,Cambridge CB2 0QQ,UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMany dietary assessment methods attempt to estimate total food and nutrient intake. If the intention is simply to determine whether participants achieve dietary recommendations, this leads to much redundant data. We used data mining techniques to explore the number of foods that intake information was required on to accurately predict achievement, or not, of key dietary recommendations.

designWe built decision trees for achievement of recommendations for fruit and vegetables, sodium, fat, saturated fat and free sugars using data from a national dietary surveillance data set. Decision trees describe complex relationships between potential predictor variables (age, sex and all foods listed in the database) and outcome variables (achievement of each of the recommendations).

settingUK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS, 2008-12). SUBJECTS: The analysis included 4156 individuals.

resultsInformation on consumption of 113 out of 3911 (3 %) foods, plus age and sex was required to accurately categorize individuals according to all five recommendations. The best trade-off between decision tree accuracy and number of foods included occurred at between eleven (for fruit and vegetables) and thirty-two (for fat, plus age) foods, achieving an accuracy of 72 % (for fat) to 83 % (for fruit and vegetables), with similar values for sensitivity and specificity.

conclusionsUsing information on intake of 113 foods, it is possible to predict with 72-83 % accuracy whether individuals achieve key dietary recommendations. Substantial further research is required to make use of these findings for dietary assessment.

Indexed as

Data MiningDietNutrition SurveysRecommended Dietary AllowancesFeeding BehaviorFruitHumansNutrition PolicyUnited KingdomVegetablesData miningDietDietary assessmentDietary pattern analysisNutrition

Identifiers

PMID26879185
PMCPMC4873899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.