ArticleAnnals of intensive care2016
Experts' recommendations for the management of cardiogenic shock in children.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Shock Across Acute Emergencies: Age Patterns, Etiologic Subtypes, and Bedside Clinical Indicators in a Single-Centre Cohort.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Signs of Circulatory Impairment/Shock in Children: A Prospective Observational Study.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Cardiogenic Shock Risk Score at Diagnosis of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children: A Multicenter Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Observational
- Management of arterial hypotension in critically Ill children: a narrative review and practical approach.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Clinical practice guidelines: management of non-post-operative supra-ventricular tachycardia in neonates and children less than 18 years old hospitalized in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Use of milrinone in pediatric intensive care units: a multicenter survey of French-speaking countries.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Current practice in pediatric post-cardiac arrest care: a national survey among Italian pediatric intensivists.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Severe and Atypical Presentation of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in a Pediatric Patient after a Serious Crash Injury-Case Report and Literature Review.Pediatric reports · 2023Article
- Advances in Shock Management and Fluid Resuscitation in Children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Refining the Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome.Pediatrics · 2022Article
- A monocyte/dendritic cell molecular signature of SARS-CoV-2-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children with severe myocarditis.Med (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Outcomes of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2019Article
- Refractory Shock in Pediatric Emergency Departments: Challenges and Innovations in Early Escalation: A Narrative Review.Sage open pediatricsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock which corresponds to an acute state of circulatory failure due to impairment of myocardial contractility is a very rare disease in children, even more than in adults. To date, no international recommendations regarding its management in critically ill children are available. An experts' recommendations in adult population have recently been made (Levy et al. Ann Intensive Care 5(1):52, 2015; Levy et al. Ann Intensive Care 5(1):26, 2015). We present herein recommendations for the management of cardiogenic shock in children, developed with the grading of recommendations' assessment, development, and evaluation system by an expert group of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies). The recommendations cover four major fields of application such as: recognition of early signs of shock and the patient pathway, management principles and therapeutic goals, monitoring hemodynamic and biological variables, and circulatory support (indications, techniques, organization, and transfer criteria). Major principle care for children with cardiogenic shock is primarily based on clinical and echocardiographic assessment. There are few drugs reported as effective in childhood in the medical literature. The use of circulatory support should be facilitated in terms of organization and reflected in the centers that support these children. Children with cardiogenic shock are vulnerable and should be followed regularly by intensivist cardiologists and pediatricians. The experts emphasize the multidisciplinary nature of management of children with cardiogenic shock and the importance of effective communication between emergency medical assistance teams (SAMU), mobile pediatric emergency units (SMUR), pediatric emergency departments, pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery departments, and pediatric intensive care units.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.