Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878993›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2017

PROP taster status, food preferences and consumption of high-calorie snacks and sweet beverages among 6-year-old ethnically diverse children.

Anne I Wijtzes, Wilma Jansen, Selma H Bouthoorn, Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong, Pauline W Jansen, Oscar H Franco, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Albert Hofman, Hein Raat

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne I WijtzesThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wilma JansenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Selma H BouthoornThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jessica C Kiefte-de JongDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Pauline W JansenDepartment of Child, and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Vincent W V JaddoeThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Albert HofmanThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hein RaatDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy diet is important for optimal growth and development in children. Food preferences are a main determinant of children's intake. The aim of this study was to examine the associations of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status (taste sensitivity to PROP) with children's food preferences and consumption of high-calorie snacks and sweet beverages among ethnically diverse children. We analysed data from 5585 6-year-old children enrolled in the Generation R Study, a birth cohort study in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PROP taster status was evaluated using a suprathreshold screening solution. Food preferences of the children were assessed by a two-stage protocol using photographs of eight food items (candy, chocolate, mayonnaise, whipped cream, soup, potato chips, carrot and bread), yielding both hedonic ratings (1-3) and rank order scores (1-8). Univariate and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, using tasters as the reference group. Non-tasters had a slightly higher preference for carrots (β: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.13, -0.02 and β: -0.15; 95% CI: -0.27, -0.02 for hedonic ratings and rank order scores, respectively) and bread (hedonic ratings; β: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01) compared with tasters. No differences were found in children's preference for sweet, fat or salty food items. Furthermore, there were no associations of PROP taster status with the consumption of high-calorie snacks ≥ 2 times/day (aOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.91,1.24) or sweet beverages ≥ 3 glasses/day (aOR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.92,1.23). Other factors relating to the family food environment may be more important for young children's food preferences and consumption of high-calorie snacks and sweet beverages than their innate taste sensitivity.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesSnacksTasteBeveragesChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisNetherlandsNutritive SweetenersPropylthiouracil6-n-propylthiouracilbirth cohort studyfood preferencePROPsnacksweet beverages

Identifiers

PMID26878993
PMCPMC6865951
OpenAlexW2281036831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.