Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878910›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

"Optical communication with brain cells by means of an implanted duplex micro-device with optogenetics and Ca(2+) fluoroimaging".

Takuma Kobayashi, Makito Haruta, Kiyotaka Sasagawa, Miho Matsumata, Kawori Eizumi, Chikara Kitsumoto, Mayumi Motoyama, Yasuyo Maezawa, Yasumi Ohta, Toshihiko Noda and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takuma KobayashiLaboratory for Developmental Gene Regulation, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Makito HarutaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Kiyotaka SasagawaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Miho MatsumataLaboratory for Developmental Gene Regulation, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Kawori EizumiLaboratory for Developmental Gene Regulation, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Chikara KitsumotoGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Mayumi MotoyamaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Yasuyo MaezawaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Yasumi OhtaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Toshihiko NodaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Takashi TokudaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.
Yasuyuki IshikawaDepartment of Systems Life Engineering, Maebashi Institute of Technology, Maebashi, Gunma 371-0816, Japan.
Jun OhtaGraduate School of Materials Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand the brain function based on neural activity, a minimally invasive analysis technology in a freely moving animal is necessary. Such technology would provide new knowledge in neuroscience and contribute to regenerative medical techniques and prosthetics care. An application that combines optogenetics for voluntarily stimulating nerves, imaging to visualize neural activity, and a wearable micro-instrument for implantation into the brain could meet the abovementioned demand. To this end, a micro-device that can be applied to the brain less invasively and a system for controlling the device has been newly developed in this study. Since the novel implantable device has dual LEDs and a CMOS image sensor, photostimulation and fluorescence imaging can be performed simultaneously. The device enables bidirectional communication with the brain by means of light. In the present study, the device was evaluated in an in vitro experiment using a new on-chip 3D neuroculture with an extracellular matrix gel and an in vivo experiment involving regenerative medical transplantation and gene delivery to the brain by using both photosensitive channel and fluorescent Ca(2+) indicator. The device succeeded in activating cells locally by selective photostimulation, and the physiological Ca(2+) dynamics of neural cells were visualized simultaneously by fluorescence imaging.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMolecular ImagingOptical ImagingOptogeneticsProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsBrainCalciumCell Culture TechniquesCell LineMicePhotic StimulationCalcium

Identifiers

PMID26878910
PMCPMC4754641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.