Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878888›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Quantitative molecular phenotyping with topically applied SERS nanoparticles for intraoperative guidance of breast cancer lumpectomy.

Yu Wang, Soyoung Kang, Altaz Khan, Gabriel Ruttner, Steven Y Leigh, Melissa Murray, Sanjee Abeytunge, Gary Peterson, Milind Rajadhyaksha, Suzanne Dintzis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Design and Synthesis of SERS Materials for In Vivo Molecular Imaging and Biosensing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yu WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Soyoung KangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Altaz KhanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University (SUNY), Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Gabriel RuttnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University (SUNY), Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Steven Y LeighDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Melissa MurrayDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Sanjee AbeytungeDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Gary PetersonDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Milind RajadhyakshaDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Suzanne DintzisDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Sara JavidDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Jonathan T C LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
University of Washington · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Endoscopic molecular imaging of esophageal cancer with multiplexed Raman nanopartR21EB015016 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C. · 2013 to 2014
$493k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need to image excised tissues during tumor-resection procedures in order to identify residual tumors at the margins and to guide their complete removal. The imaging of dysregulated cell-surface receptors is a potential means of identifying the presence of diseases with high sensitivity and specificity. However, due to heterogeneities in the expression of protein biomarkers in tumors, molecular-imaging technologies should ideally be capable of visualizing a multiplexed panel of cancer biomarkers. Here, we demonstrate that the topical application and quantification of a multiplexed cocktail of receptor-targeted surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanoparticles (NPs) enables rapid quantitative molecular phenotyping (QMP) of the surface of freshly excised tissues to determine the presence of disease. In order to mitigate the ambiguity due to nonspecific sources of contrast such as off-target binding or uneven delivery, a ratiometric method is employed to quantify the specific vs. nonspecific binding of the multiplexed NPs. Validation experiments with human tumor cell lines, fresh human tumor xenografts in mice, and fresh human breast specimens demonstrate that QMP imaging of excised tissues agrees with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, and that this technique may be achieved in less than 15 minutes for potential intraoperative use in guiding breast-conserving surgeries.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNanoparticlesReceptors, Cell SurfaceAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHeterograftsHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalMiceMolecular ImagingSpectrum Analysis, RamanSurgery, Computer-AssistedBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID26878888
PMCPMC4754709
OpenAlexW2410445673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.