Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878870›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Evolutionary Relationships among Extinct and Extant Sloths: The Evidence of Mitogenomes and Retroviruses.

Graham J Slater, Pin Cui, Analía M Forasiepi, Dorina Lenz, Kyriakos Tsangaras, Bryson Voirin, Nadia de Moraes-Barros, Ross D E MacPhee, Alex D Greenwood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolutionary Specializations in the Venous Anatomy of the Two-Toed Sloth (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On the move: sloths and their epibionts as model mobile ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Graham J SlaterDepartment of Paleobiology & Division of Mammals, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago.
Pin CuiLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Analía M ForasiepiCCT-Mendoza, IANIGLA, Mendoza, Argentina.
Dorina LenzLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Kyriakos TsangarasLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
Bryson VoirinMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Nadia de Moraes-BarrosCibio/Inbio - Centro De Investigação Em Biodiversidade E Recursos Genéticos, Universidade Do Porto, Vairão, Portugal.
Ross D E MacPheeDepartment of Mammalogy and Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY macphee@amnh.org;greenwood@izw-berlin.de.
Alex D GreenwoodLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany macphee@amnh.org;greenwood@izw-berlin.de.
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DEAmerican Museum of Natural History · USCentro Científico Tecnológico - Mendoza · ARFreie Universität Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute for Ornithology · DESmithsonian Institution · USUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

A singular opportunity to determine the evolutionary genetics of retroviral invasR01GM092706 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ROCA, ALFRED LUIS · 2011 to 2013
$849k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroevolutionary trends exhibited by retroviruses are complex and not entirely understood. The sloth endogenized foamy-like retrovirus (SloEFV), which demonstrates incongruence in virus-host evolution among extant sloths (Order Folivora), has not been investigated heretofore in any extinct sloth lineages and its premodern history within folivorans is therefore unknown. Determining retroviral coevolutionary trends requires a robust phylogeny of the viral host, but the highly reduced modern sloth fauna (6 species in 2 genera) does not adequately represent what was once a highly diversified clade (∼100 genera) of placental mammals. At present, the amount of molecular data available for extinct sloth taxa is limited, and analytical results based on these data tend to conflict with phylogenetic inferences made on the basis of morphological studies. To augment the molecular data set, we applied hybridization capture and next-generation Illumina sequencing to two extinct and three extant sloth species to retrieve full mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) from the hosts and the polymerase gene of SloEFV. The results produced a fully resolved and well-supported phylogeny that supports dividing crown families into two major clades: 1) The three-toed sloth, Bradypus, and Nothrotheriidae and 2) Megalonychidae, including the two-toed sloth, Choloepus, and Mylodontidae. Our calibrated time tree indicates that the Miocene epoch (23.5 Ma), particularly its earlier part, was an important interval for folivoran diversification. Both extant and extinct sloths demonstrate multiple complex invasions of SloEFV into the ancestral sloth germline followed by subsequent introgressions across different sloth lineages. Thus, sloth mitogenome and SloEFV evolution occurred separately and in parallel among sloths.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsMammalsPhylogenyRetroviridaeSlothsancient DNAfoamy virushybridization capturemitogenomesretrovirus–host coevolutionsloth

Identifiers

PMID26878870
PMCPMC4824031
OpenAlexW2293720495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.