Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878755›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2016

Non-heat-treated frozen raspberries the most likely vehicle of a norovirus outbreak in Oslo, Norway, November 2013.

M Einöder-Moreno, H Lange, M Grepp, E Osborg, K Vainio, L Vold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Challenges of investigating a large food-borne norovirus outbreak across all branches of a restaurant group in the United Kingdom, October 2016.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Food safety challenges and One Health within Europe.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M Einöder-MorenoDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology,Norwegian Institute of Public Health,Oslo,Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-2153
H LangeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology,Norwegian Institute of Public Health,Oslo,Norway.
M GreppDepartment of Public Health,Health Agency,Municipality of Oslo,Oslo,Norway.
E OsborgNorwegian Food Safety Authority,Oslo,Norway.
K VainioDepartment of Virology,Norwegian Institute of Public Health,Oslo,Norway.
L VoldDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology,Norwegian Institute of Public Health,Oslo,Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian Food Safety Authority · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In November 2013, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health was notified of a gastroenteritis outbreak following two meetings held at a conference centre. Identical food and beverages were served during the meetings. We investigated in order to identify the vehicle of infection and implement control measures. Meeting participants completed an online questionnaire on consumption of foods and beverages. We asked symptomatic participants to provide a stool sample. We defined a case as diarrhoea and/or vomiting in a participant who became ill within 3 days after the meeting. We calculated attack rates (AR) and adjusted risk ratios (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using binomial regression. We conducted environmental investigations. Overall, 147/168 (88%) participants responded, of which 74 (50%) met the case definition. All five stool samples provided were norovirus positive. No kitchen staff reported being sick. Risk of illness was higher in those who consumed raspberry mousse (aRR 3·4, 95% CI 1·4-8·2) and sliced fresh fruit (aRR 1·9, 95% CI 1·3-2·8). Seventy cases (95%) ate raspberry mousse. Frozen raspberries used for the mousse were imported and not heat-treated before consumption. Non-heat-treated frozen raspberries were the most likely outbreak vehicle. Contamination by a food handler could not be excluded. We recommend heat-treatment of imported frozen berries before consumption.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksFood MicrobiologyAdultAgedCaliciviridae InfectionsCohort StudiesFemaleFoodborne DiseasesFrozen FoodsGastroenteritisHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorovirusNorwayRetrospective StudiesBerriesCaliciviridae infectionsdisease outbreaksfoodborne diseasesnorovirus

Identifiers

PMID26878755
PMCPMC9150410
OpenAlexW2273991625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.