Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878319›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2016

A 3D bioprinting system to produce human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity.

Hyun-Wook Kang, Sang Jin Lee, In Kap Ko, Carlos Kengla, James J Yoo, Anthony Atala

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04748016 (Sterilised 3D-PRINTed Bone Models in Addition to Conventional CT Imaging for Operative Visualisation in Complex Intra-articular Fracture Repair - A Multi-centre, Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 854 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
854citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04748016 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Sterilised 3D-PRINTed Bone Models in Addition to Conventional CT Imaging for Operative Visualisation in Complex Intra-articular Fracture Repair - A Multi-centre, Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2020 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsDistal Humerus Fracture, Distal Femur Fracture, Distal Tibia Fracture, Proximal Humeral FractureArms3D printed (3DP) bone models + CT imaging, CT imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

854 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cryopreservative Bioink Enables Direct Bioprinting of Adherent Cells.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

794 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyun-Wook KangWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Sang Jin LeeWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-1909
In Kap KoWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Carlos KenglaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
James J YooWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony AtalaWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A challenge for tissue engineering is producing three-dimensional (3D), vascularized cellular constructs of clinically relevant size, shape and structural integrity. We present an integrated tissue-organ printer (ITOP) that can fabricate stable, human-scale tissue constructs of any shape. Mechanical stability is achieved by printing cell-laden hydrogels together with biodegradable polymers in integrated patterns and anchored on sacrificial hydrogels. The correct shape of the tissue construct is achieved by representing clinical imaging data as a computer model of the anatomical defect and translating the model into a program that controls the motions of the printer nozzles, which dispense cells to discrete locations. The incorporation of microchannels into the tissue constructs facilitates diffusion of nutrients to printed cells, thereby overcoming the diffusion limit of 100-200 μm for cell survival in engineered tissues. We demonstrate capabilities of the ITOP by fabricating mandible and calvarial bone, cartilage and skeletal muscle. Future development of the ITOP is being directed to the production of tissues for human applications and to the building of more complex tissues and solid organs.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBioprintingHumansHydrogelsMandiblePolymersTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID26878319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.