Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878216›Full record

ArticleActa oto-laryngologica2016

Near-infrared-spectroscopic study on processing of sounds in the brain; a comparison between native and non-native speakers of Japanese.

Koichi Tsunoda, Sotaro Sekimoto, Kenji Itoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oto-laryngologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Koichi Tsunodaa Department of Artificial Organs and Medical Creations , National Hospital Organization, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Tokyo Medical Center , Tokyo , Japan.
Sotaro Sekimotoa Department of Artificial Organs and Medical Creations , National Hospital Organization, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Tokyo Medical Center , Tokyo , Japan.
Kenji Itoha Department of Artificial Organs and Medical Creations , National Hospital Organization, National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Tokyo Medical Center , Tokyo , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conclusions The result suggested that mother tongue Japanese and non- mother tongue Japanese differ in their pattern of brain dominance when listening to sounds from the natural world-in particular, insect sounds. These results reveal significant support for previous findings from Tsunoda (in 1970). Objectives This study concentrates on listeners who show clear evidence of a 'speech' brain vs a 'music' brain and determines which side is most active in the processing of insect sounds, using with near-infrared spectroscopy. Methods The present study uses 2-channel Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) to provide a more direct measure of left- and right-brain activity while participants listen to each of three types of sounds: Japanese speech, Western violin music, or insect sounds. Data were obtained from 33 participants who showed laterality on opposite sides for Japanese speech and Western music. Results Results showed that a majority (80%) of the MJ participants exhibited dominance for insect sounds on the side that was dominant for language, while a majority (62%) of the non-MJ participants exhibited dominance for insect sounds on the side that was dominant for music.

Indexed as

LanguageSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansJapanMaleSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultBrain dominanceJapanese brainJapanese languagemother tonguenear-infrared spectroscopyspeech and hearingTsunoda’s Theory

Identifiers

PMID26878216
PMCPMC4898151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.