Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878198›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2016

Using MD Simulations To Calculate How Solvents Modulate Solubility.

Shuai Liu, Shannon Cao, Kevin Hoang, Kayla L Young, Andrew S Paluch, David L Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Data-Driven Critical Evaluation of the General Solubility Equation.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular simulation as a computational pharmaceutics tool to predict drug solubility, solubilization processes and partitioning.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuai Liu
Shannon Cao
Kevin Hoang
Kayla L YoungDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University , Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
Andrew S PaluchDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University , Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
David L Mobley
Miami University · US

Funding

Computational alchemy for molecular design and optimizationR01GM108889 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2014 to 2022
$2.5M
Testing and improving alchemical techniques for predicting protein-ligand bindingR15GM096257 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2012 to 2012
$268k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM108889-01NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM096257-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108889NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM096257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, our interest is in predicting solubility in general, and we focus particularly on predicting how the solubility of particular solutes is modulated by the solvent environment. Solubility in general is extremely important, both for theoretical reasons - it provides an important probe of the balance between solute-solute and solute-solvent interactions - and for more practical reasons, such as how to control the solubility of a given solute via modulation of its environment, as in process chemistry and separations. Here, we study how the change of solvent affects the solubility of a given compound. That is, we calculate relative solubilities. We use MD simulations to calculate relative solubility and compare our calculated values with experiment as well as with results from several other methods, SMD and UNIFAC, the latter of which is commonly used in chemical engineering design. We find that straightforward solubility calculations based on molecular simulations using a general small-molecule force field outperform SMD and UNIFAC both in terms of accuracy and coverage of the relevant chemical space.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationSolubilitySolventsThermodynamicsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID26878198
PMCPMC4945102
OpenAlexW2287447491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.