Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878138›Full record

ArticleComputerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society2016

A multi-center milestone study of clinical vertebral CT segmentation.

Jianhua Yao, Joseph E Burns, Daniel Forsberg, Alexander Seitel, Abtin Rasoulian, Purang Abolmaesumi, Kerstin Hammernik, Martin Urschler, Bulat Ibragimov, Robert Korez and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Deep learning model for automated detection of fresh and old vertebral fractures on thoracolumbar CT.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Marching Windows: Scalable Mesh Generation for Volumetric Data With Multiple Materials.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Jianhua YaoImaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Detection Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Joseph E BurnsDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92868, USA.
Daniel ForsbergSectra, Linköping, Sweden & Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Alexander SeitelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Abtin RasoulianDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Purang AbolmaesumiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kerstin HammernikInstitute for Computer Graphics and Vision, BioTechMed, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Martin UrschlerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Clinical Forensic Imaging, Graz, Austria.
Bulat IbragimovUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Robert KorezUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomaž VrtovecUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Isaac Castro-MateosCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jose M PozoCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Alejandro F FrangiCentre for Computational Imaging and Simulation Technologies in Biomedicine (CISTIB), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ronald M SummersImaging Biomarkers and Computer-Aided Detection Laboratory, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Shuo LiGE Healthcare & University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: slishuo@gmail.com.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Sheffield · GBNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USGraz University of Technology · ATLinköping University · SELudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention · ATUniversity of California, Irvine · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Computer Aided Detection for Radiologic ImagesZIACL040004 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SUMMERS, RONALD M. · 2009 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiple center milestone study of clinical vertebra segmentation is presented in this paper. Vertebra segmentation is a fundamental step for spinal image analysis and intervention. The first half of the study was conducted in the spine segmentation challenge in 2014 International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) Workshop on Computational Spine Imaging (CSI 2014). The objective was to evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art vertebra segmentation algorithms on computed tomography (CT) scans using ten training and five testing dataset, all healthy cases; the second half of the study was conducted after the challenge, where additional 5 abnormal cases are used for testing to evaluate the performance under abnormal cases. Dice coefficients and absolute surface distances were used as evaluation metrics. Segmentation of each vertebra as a single geometric unit, as well as separate segmentation of vertebra substructures, was evaluated. Five teams participated in the comparative study. The top performers in the study achieved Dice coefficient of 0.93 in the upper thoracic, 0.95 in the lower thoracic and 0.96 in the lumbar spine for healthy cases, and 0.88 in the upper thoracic, 0.89 in the lower thoracic and 0.92 in the lumbar spine for osteoporotic and fractured cases. The strengths and weaknesses of each method as well as future suggestion for improvement are discussed. This is the first multi-center comparative study for vertebra segmentation methods, which will provide an up-to-date performance milestone for the fast growing spinal image analysis and intervention.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAged, 80 and overCaliforniaFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, AutomatedRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftware Validation

Identifiers

PMID26878138
PMCPMC5527557
OpenAlexW2222318341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.