Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26878054›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2016

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with 1-year follow-up: factors predictive of success.

G Lopez-Nava, M Galvao, I Bautista-Castaño, J P Fernandez-Corbelle, M Trell

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02948621 completednot on this map

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty

TypeobservationalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2016 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsMorbid ObesityArmsEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
NCT03554902 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Endoscopic Gastric Tubulization

TypeobservationalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2018 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsMorbid ObesityArmsEndoscopic gastric tubulization
NCT04945473 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Impact of Endoscopic Gastric Revision by Application of Additional Sutures on Weight Loss After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Obese Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2021 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsMorbid ObesityArmsEndoscopic placement of additional sutures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty worldwide for treatment of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Endoscopic bariatrics: current therapies and future directions.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in gastrointestinal surgical endoscopy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Opportunities and challenges of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G Lopez-NavaBariatric Endoscopy Unit, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital.
M GalvaoGastro Obeso Center, Gastrointestinal Surgery, São Paulo, Brazil.
I Bautista-CastañoBariatric Endoscopy Unit, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital.
J P Fernandez-CorbelleBariatric Endoscopy Unit, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital.
M TrellBariatric Endoscopy Unit, Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital.
Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESGastro Obeso Center · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsBariatric endoscopy has emerged as an aid in the nonsurgical treatment of obesity. The objective of this study is to critically provide the results and follow-up of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty 1 year after the procedure. PATIENTS AND

methodsProspective single-center follow-up study of 25 patients (5 men, 20 women) who underwent flexible endoscopic suturing for endoluminal gastric volume reduction. A multidisciplinary team provided post-procedure care. Patient outcomes were recorded at 1 year after the procedure. Linear regression analysis was done to evaluate the variables associated with best results at 1 year of follow-up.

resultsMean body mass index (BMI) was 38.5 ± 4.6 kg/m(2) (range 30 - 47) and mean age 44.5 ± 8.2 years (range 29 - 60). At 1 year, 22 patients continued with the follow-up (2 dropped out at 6 months and 1 at 3 months). There were no major intra-procedural, early, or delayed adverse events. Mean BMI loss was 7.3 ± 4.2 kg/m(2), and mean percentage of total body weight loss was 18.7 ± 10.7 at 1 year. In the linear regression analysis, adjusted by initial BMI, variables associated with %TBWL involved the frequency of nutritional (β = 0.563, P = 0.014) and psychological contacts (β = 0.727, P = 0.025). The number of nutritional and psychological contacts were predictive of good weight loss results.

conclusionsEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is a feasible, reproducible, and effective procedure to treat obesity. Nutritional and psychological interaction are predictive of success.

Identifiers

PMID26878054
PMCPMC4751018
OpenAlexW2279909847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.