ArticleActualizaciones en SIDA e infectologia2014
[Barriers to adherence and retention in public and private healthcare according to patients and health workers].
Article in Actualizaciones en SIDA e infectologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Retention in care and distance between home and hospital in HIV patients of Buenos Aires City].Actualizaciones en SIDA e infectologia · 2018Article
- Article
- Implementation and uptake of the Conexiones y Opciones en la Argentina intervention: feasibility and acceptability.AIDS care · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe National Program of AIDS guarantees universal access to antiretroviral medication, yet people receiving treatment through the public healthcare system do not achieve an undetectable viral load in the same rate than patients in the private system. This qualitative study aims to identify factors associated with adherence and retention in the HIV-cascade of care at public and private setting from Buenos Aires, based on patients and healthcare workers' perceptions.
methodsQualitative data from 12 semi-structured interviews with key informants and 4 focus groups of patients and healthcare workers from the public and private systems were recorded. Transcripts were coded and analyzed, using the QRS Nvivo9® software for qualitative data analysis, into set themes on adherence.
resultsPatients and healthcare workers of both systems agree on the importance of HIV-related stigma, professional-patient relationship and communication, and the division of treatment-related responsibilities as fundamental aspects for adherence and retention in the HIV-cascade of care. Differences in the manner these factors interact were observed between healthcare systems. Structural barriers are presented as the main adherence barrier in the public system. DISCUSSION: The need for interventions focused on the doctor-patient dyad considering the features of each healthcare is highlighted in order to facilitate patient engagement in adherence.
Identifiers
26878024PMC4751985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.