ArticleZooKeys2016
Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names.
Article in ZooKeys, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Making floras computable: Audited translation of flora of China as reusable taxonomic knowledge.Plant diversity · 2026Article
- SpeciMate: Improving metadata extraction from digitised biological specimens.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- PNSS: An online plant name service system.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- Arctos: Community-driven innovations for managing natural and cultural history collections.PloS one · 2024Article
- Paying it forward: Crowdsourcing the harmonisation and linking of taxon names and biodiversity identifiers.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Repositories for Taxonomic Data: Where We Are and What is Missing.Systematic biology · 2020Review
- A novel curation system to facilitate data integration across regional citizen science survey programs.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Inferring the mammal tree: Species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- A dataset of egg size and shape from more than 6,700 insect species.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Article
- Biodiversity Observations Miner: A web application to unlock primary biodiversity data from published literature.Biodiversity data journal · 2019Article
- COPIOUS: A gold standard corpus of named entities towards extracting species occurrence from biodiversity literature.Biodiversity data journal · 2019Article
- Developing a vocabulary and ontology for modeling insect natural history data: example data, use cases, and competency questions.Biodiversity data journal · 2019Article
- OpenBiodiv-O: ontology of the OpenBiodiv knowledge management system.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018Article
- Constructing a biodiversity terminological inventory.PloS one · 2017Article
- Automated assembly of a reference taxonomy for phylogenetic data synthesis.Biodiversity data journal · 2017Article
- Challenges with using names to link digital biodiversity information.Biodiversity data journal · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- The List of Available Names (LAN): A new generation for stable taxonomic names in zoology?ZooKeys · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than 250 years, the taxonomic enterprise has remained almost unchanged. Certainly, the tools of the trade have improved: months-long journeys aboard sailing ships have been reduced to hours aboard jet airplanes; advanced technology allows humans to access environments that were once utterly inaccessible; GPS has replaced crude maps; digital hi-resolution imagery provides far more accurate renderings of organisms that even the best commissioned artists of a century ago; and primitive candle-lit microscopes have been replaced by an array of technologies ranging from scanning electron microscopy to DNA sequencing. But the basic paradigm remains the same. Perhaps the most revolutionary change of all - which we are still in the midst of, and which has not yet been fully realized - is the means by which taxonomists manage and communicate the information of their trade. The rapid evolution in recent decades of computer database management software, and of information dissemination via the Internet, have both dramatically improved the potential for streamlining the entire taxonomic process. Unfortunately, the potential still largely exceeds the reality. The vast majority of taxonomic information is either not yet digitized, or digitized in a form that does not allow direct and easy access. Moreover, the information that is easily accessed in digital form is not yet seamlessly interconnected. In an effort to bring reality closer to potential, a loose affiliation of major taxonomic resources, including GBIF, the Encyclopedia of Life, NBII, Catalog of Life, ITIS, IPNI, ICZN, Index Fungorum, and many others have been crafting a "Global Names Architecture" (GNA). The intention of the GNA is not to replace any of the existing taxonomic data initiatives, but rather to serve as a dynamic index to interconnect them in a way that streamlines the entire taxonomic enterprise: from gathering specimens in the field, to publication of new taxa and related data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.