Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26877625›Full record

ArticleJournal of science education and technology2016

Using Interactive Data Visualizations for Exploratory Analysis in Undergraduate Genomics Coursework: Field Study Findings and Guidelines.

Barbara Mirel, Anuj Kumar, Paige Nong, Gang Su, Fan Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of science education and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara MirelSchool of Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Anuj KumarDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paige NongLeondale Germiston, South Africa.
Gang SuMolecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Fan MengMolecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Interactive Medline Search Engine Integrating External InformationR01LM009812 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MENG, FAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life scientists increasingly use visual analytics to explore large data sets and generate hypotheses. Undergraduate biology majors should be learning these same methods. Yet visual analytics is one of the most underdeveloped areas of undergraduate biology education. This study sought to determine the feasibility of undergraduate biology majors conducting exploratory analysis using the same interactive data visualizations as practicing scientists. We examined 22 upper level undergraduates in a genomics course as they engaged in a case-based inquiry with an interactive heat map. We qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed students' visual analytic behaviors, reasoning and outcomes to identify student performance patterns, commonly shared efficiencies and task completion. We analyzed students' successes and difficulties in applying knowledge and skills relevant to the visual analytics case and related gaps in knowledge and skill to associated tool designs. Findings show that undergraduate engagement in visual analytics is feasible and could be further strengthened through tool usability improvements. We identify these improvements. We speculate, as well, on instructional considerations that our findings suggested may also enhance visual analytics in case-based modules.

Indexed as

Case-based instructionCollege biologyCritical thinkingData visualizationTechnologyVisual analytics

Identifiers

PMID26877625
PMCPMC4750641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.