ArticleLaser therapy2015
405 nm diode laser, halogen lamp and LED device comparison in dental composites cure: an "in vitro" experimental trial.
Article in Laser therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mouthguard-Type Wearable Sensor for Monitoring Salivary Turbidity to Assess Oral Hygiene.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In Vitro Assessment of SWEEPS and Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Alone or in Combination for EradicatingPharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Use of Blue and Blue-Violet Lasers in Dentistry: A Narrative Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2021Review
- Scanning electron microscopy analysis of aligner fitting on anchorage attachments.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2019Article
- 450 nm diode laser: A new help in oral surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2016Article
- [Light-curing effectiveness using led lamps: a review].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsA 405 nm diode laser is indicated for composite materials polymerizing, thanks to the recent evolution in their compositions, absorbing in blue part of the spectrum. The purpose of this research was to evaluate its performance on two different kinds of composite resins. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo different composites were polymerized with a traditional halogen lamp, a LED device and a 405 nm diode laser. The depth of the cure, the volumetric shrinkage, and the degree of the conversion (DC%) of the double bond during the curing process were measured. One-way ANOVA test, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Dunn comparison tests were used for statistic analysis.
resultsRegarding the depth of polymerization, the laser had the worst performance on one composite while on the other, no significant difference with the other devices was observed. The volumetric shrinkage showed that laser produced the lowest change in both of the composites. The DC% measure confirmed these findings.
conclusionsBased on the results of this preliminary study, it is not possible to recommend the 405 nm diode laser for the polymerization of dental composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.