ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2016
Mechanisms of xenobiotic receptor activation: Direct vs. indirect.
Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary variations drive divergent phenotypic, transcriptomic, and metatranscriptomic profiles in Biomphalaria glabrata, a schistosomiasis vector snail.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Kynurenine Pathway, Nrf2 and NF-κB Cross-Regulation in the CNS: An Overview.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Liquid Crystal Monomers and Their Mixtures Alter Nuclear Receptor Signaling and Promote Adipogenesis In Vitro.Endocrinology · 2025Article
- Activation of Nuclear Receptor CAR: A Pathway to Delay Aging through Enhanced Capacity for Xenobiotic Resistance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Targeting farnesoid X receptor as aging intervention therapy.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Article
- Personalized statin therapy: Targeting metabolic processes to modulate the therapeutic and adverse effects of statins.Heliyon · 2025Review
- The role of the tryptophan metabolites in gut microbiota-brain axis and potential treatments: a focus on ischemic stroke.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Bread crust extract is a novel activator of aryl hydrocarbon receptor and modulator of NRF2 and NFκB in HepG2 and HCT 116 cells.Current research in food science · 2025Article
- The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine: microRNA Takes Center Stage.Non-coding RNA · 2024Article
- Tuberculosis-diabetes comorbidities: Mechanistic insights for clinical considerations and treatment challenges.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- The role of DNA methylation on gene expression in the vertebrae of ancestrally benzo[a]pyrene exposed F1 and F3 male medaka.Epigenetics · 2023Article
- Review
- Okadaic Acid Activates JAK/STAT Signaling to Affect Xenobiotic Metabolism in HepaRG Cells.Cells · 2023Article
- Discovery of Novel Human Constitutive Androstane Receptor Agonists with the Imidazo[1,2-Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- Microbial Metabolites as Ligands to Xenobiotic Receptors: Chemical Mimicry as Potential Drugs of the Future.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023Review
- Phenobarbital in Nuclear Receptor Activation: An Update.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023Review
- Why Do Dietary Flavonoids Have a Promising Effect as Enhancers of Anthracyclines? Hydroxyl Substituents, Bioavailability and Biological Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Alternatives to rifampicin: A review and perspectives on the choice of strong CYP3A inducers for clinical drug-drug interaction studies.Clinical and translational science · 2022Review
- Impact of Neonatal Activation of Nuclear Receptor CAR (Nr1i3) on Cyp2 Gene Expression in Adult Mouse Liver.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The so-called xenobiotic receptors (XRs) have functionally evolved into cellular sensors for both endogenous and exogenous stimuli by regulating the transcription of genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters, as well as those involving energy homeostasis, cell proliferation, and/or immune responses. Unlike prototypical steroid hormone receptors, XRs are activated through both direct ligand-binding and ligand-independent (indirect) mechanisms by a plethora of structurally unrelated chemicals. This review covers research literature that discusses direct vs. indirect activation of XRs. A particular focus is centered on the signaling control of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR), the pregnane X receptor (PXR), and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). We expect that this review will shed light on both the common and distinct mechanisms associated with activation of these three XRs. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Xenobiotic nuclear receptors: New Tricks for An Old Dog, edited by Dr. Wen Xie.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.