Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26877119›Full record

ReviewPsychophysiology2016

Panic disorder with agoraphobia from a behavioral neuroscience perspective: Applying the research principles formulated by the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative.

Alfons O Hamm, Jan Richter, Christiane Pané-Farré, Dorte Westphal, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, Anna N Vossbeck-Elsebusch, Alexander L Gerlach, Andrew T Gloster, Andreas Ströhle, Thomas Lang and 5 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. The Organization of Anxiety Symptoms Along the Threat Imminence Continuum.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anxiety and Startle Phenotypes inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alfons O HammDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jan RichterDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Christiane Pané-FarréDepartment of Biological and Clinical Psychology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Dorte WestphalInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich WittchenInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Anna N Vossbeck-ElsebuschDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Alexander L GerlachDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Andrew T GlosterDepartment of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas StröhleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas LangChristoph-Dornier Foundation for Clinical Psychology, Bremen, Germany.
Tilo KircherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Antje B M GerdesDepartment Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Georg W AlpersDepartment Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas ReifDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jürgen DeckertDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current review, we reconceptualize a categorical diagnosis-panic disorder and agoraphobia-in terms of two constructs within the domain "negative valence systems" suggested by the Research Domain Criteria initiative. Panic attacks are considered as abrupt and intense fear responses to acute threat arising from inside the body, while anxious apprehension refers to anxiety responses to potential harm and more distant or uncertain threat. Taking a dimensional view, panic disorder with agoraphobia is defined with the threat-imminence model stating that defensive responses are dynamically organized along the dimension of the proximity of the threat. We tested this model within a large group of patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia (N = 369 and N = 124 in a replication sample) and found evidence that panic attacks are indeed instances of circa strike defense. This component of the defensive reactivity was related to genetic modulators within the serotonergic system. In contrast, anxious apprehension-characterized by attentive freezing during postencounter defense-was related to general distress and depressive mood, as well as to genetic modulations within the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Patients with a strong behavioral tendency for active and passive avoidance responded better to exposure treatment if the therapist guides the patient through the exposure exercises.

Indexed as

AgoraphobiaAnimalsAvoidance LearningClinical Trials as TopicDefense MechanismsFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalMulticenter Studies as TopicNeurosciencesPanic DisorderReflex, StartleRisk FactorsAnxietyAutonomicGeneticsPsychopathologicalPsychopathologyStartle Blink

Identifiers

PMID26877119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.