Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26876756›Full record

ArticleBrain research bulletin2016

Ecological momentary assessment of affect and craving in patients in treatment for prescription opioid dependence.

Andrew S Huhn, Jonathan Harris, H Harrington Cleveland, David M Lydon, Dean Stankoski, Michael J Cleveland, Erin Deneke, Scott C Bunce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Daily associations among craving, affect, and social interactions in the lives of patients during residential opioid use disorder treatment.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew S HuhnDepartment of Psychiatry, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Jonathan HarrisDepartment of Psychiatry, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
H Harrington ClevelandDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
David M LydonDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Dean StankoskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Michael J ClevelandEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.
Erin DenekeCaron Treatment Centers, Wernersville, PA, United States.
Scott C BunceDepartment of Psychiatry, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States. Electronic address: sbunce@hmc.psu.edu.

Funding

PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
Prescription Opioid Dependence Physiology Emotion and Treatment OutcomeR01DA035240 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI BUNCE, SCOTT C, MEYER, ROGER EMIL · 2013 to 2015
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035240NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low positive affect (PA) is likely to contribute to risk of relapse; however, it has received relatively little attention in clinical research. This study examined the associations among positive affect, negative affect (NA), and craving in medically withdrawn patients using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Participants (n=73) provided reports of their PA, NA, and craving 4 times a day for an average of 10.47 (SD=3.80) days. Person- and day-level associations between PA, NA, and craving were examined using multilevel models. A significant interaction emerged between person- and day-level PA such that PA on the day level was negatively associated with craving for individuals experiencing low mean PA throughout the study. No significant interaction emerged between person- and day-level NA. The main effects for both person- and day-level NA were significant. Individuals experiencing high NA throughout the study experienced higher craving overall and on days when NA was higher than usual, craving was also higher. Results suggest that high person- and day-level NA may directly contribute to the risk for relapse via increased craving, whereas low day- level PA may contribute to risk for relapse among individuals exhibiting low person-level PA via increased craving on days with lower than average levels of PA for those individuals. Given that there is a paucity of research relating low PA to craving, continued investigation into how and when low PA creates risk for relapse is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAffectCravingCuesEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersAddictionCravingEcological momentary assessmentPositive affectPrescription opioidsSubstance abuse treatment

Identifiers

PMID26876756
PMCPMC4919812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.