Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26876739›Full record

ArticleBrain research2016

Effects of nicotinic receptor agonists on bladder afferent nerve activity in an in vitro bladder-pelvic nerve preparation.

Yongbei Yu, Stephanie L Daugherty, William C de Groat

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Dog and human bladders have different neurogenic and nicotinic responses in inner versus outer detrusor muscle layers.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yongbei YuDepartment of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States. Electronic address: yyu407@yahoo.com.
Stephanie L DaughertyDepartment of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
William C de GroatDepartment of Pharmacology & Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Urothelium in Detrusor OveractivityP01DK093424 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEGROAT, WILLIAM C · 2013 to 2017
$7.9M
Bladder Nociception: function/central projection of Sympathetic Afferent PathwayR01DK091253 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DEGROAT, WILLIAM C · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-091253NIDDK NIH HHS DK-093424NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK093424NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK091253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effects of nicotinic receptor agonists (epibatidine and nicotine) on mechano-sensitive bladder afferent nerve (MS-BAN) activity were studied in an in vitro bladder-pelvic afferent nerve preparation. MS-BAN activity was induced by isotonic distention of the bladder at pressures of 10-40 cmH2O. The effect of epibatidine varied according to the concentration, route of administration and the intravesical pressure stimulus. Epibatidine (300-500 nM) administered in the perfusate to the serosal surface of the bladder decreased distension evoked afferent firing by 30-50% depending on the bladder pressure. However these concentrations also produced an immediate increase in tonic afferent firing in the empty bladder. Lower concentrations (50-100 nM) elicited weaker and more variable effects. The inhibitory effects were blocked by bath application of mecamylamine (150 µM) a nicotinic receptor antagonist. Bath application of nicotine (20 µM) elicited similar effects. Intravesical administration of epibatidine (500 nM) significantly increased MS-BAN firing by 15-30%; while lower concentrations (200-300 nM) were ineffective. This facilitatory effect of epibatidine was blocked by intravesical administration of mecamylamine (250 µM). Electrical stimulation on the surface of the bladder elicited action potentials (AP) in BAN. Bath application of epibatidine (300 nM) or nicotine (20 µM) did not change either the voltage threshold or the area of evoked AP. These results indicate that nicotinic agonists: (1) enhance MS-BAN activity originating at afferent receptors near the urothelium, (2) inhibit MS-BAN activity originating at afferent receptors located at other sites in the bladder, (3) directly excite unidentified afferents, (4) do not alter afferent axonal excitability.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdministration, IntravesicalAnimalsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicMaleNeurons, AfferentNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsPeripheral Nervous SystemPyridinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicUrinary BladderBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicepibatidineNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsPyridinesReceptors, NicotinicBladder afferent nervesEpibatidineNeuronal nicotinic receptorsNicotineUrothelium

Identifiers

PMID26876739
PMCPMC4821725
OpenAlexW2255894809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.