Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26876685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

An Ultra-thin Amniotic Membrane as Carrier in Corneal Epithelium Tissue-Engineering.

Liying Zhang, Dulei Zou, Sanming Li, Junqi Wang, Yangluowa Qu, Shangkun Ou, Changkai Jia, Juan Li, Hui He, Tingting Liu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Membranes for the life sciences and their future roles in medicine.Chinese journal of chemical engineering · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Amniotic membrane as novel scaffold for human iPSC-derived cardiomyogenesis.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2019
    Article
  14. Corneal Repair and Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liying ZhangEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Dulei ZouEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Sanming LiEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Junqi WangEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yangluowa QuEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Shangkun OuEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Changkai JiaEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Juan LiEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Hui HeEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Tingting LiuEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jie YangEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Yongxiong ChenEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zuguo LiuEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Wei LiEye Institute of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Xiamen University · CNShandong First Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amniotic membranes (AMs) are widely used as a corneal epithelial tissue carrier in reconstruction surgery. However, the engineered tissue transparency is low due to the translucent thick underlying AM stroma. To overcome this drawback, we developed an ultra-thin AM (UAM) by using collagenase IV to strip away from the epithelial denuded AM (DAM) some of the stroma. By thinning the stroma to about 30 μm, its moist and dry forms were rendered acellular, optically clear and its collagen framework became compacted and inerratic. Engineered rabbit corneal epithelial cell (RCEC) sheets generated through expansion of limbal epithelial cells on UAM were more transparent and thicker than those expanded on DAM. Moreover, ΔNp63 and ABCG2 gene expression was greater in tissue engineered cell sheets expanded on UAM than on DAM. Furthermore, 2 weeks after surgery, the cornea grafted with UAM based cell sheets showed higher transparency and more stratified epithelium than the cornea grafted with DAM based cell sheets. Taken together, tissue engineered corneal epithelium generated on UAM has a preferable outcome because the transplanted tissue is more transparent and better resembles the phenotype of the native tissue than that obtained by using DAM for this procedure. UAM preserves compact layer of the amniotic membrane and maybe an ideal substrate for corneal epithelial tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Tissue Engineering3T3 CellsAmnionAnimalsCell DifferentiationCollagenasesCorneaCorneal DiseasesCorneal StromaEpithelium, CornealMiceRabbitsCollagenases

Identifiers

PMID26876685
PMCPMC4753477
OpenAlexW2276979229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.